tle="Gemini Planet Imager">Gemini Planet Imager, VLT-SPHERE, and SCExAO will image dozens of gas giants, however the vast majority of known extrasolar planets have only been detected through indirect methods. The following are the indirect methods that have proven useful:

Indirect methods

If a planet crosses (or transits) in front of its parent star's disk, then the observed brightness of the star drops by a small amount. The amount by which the star dims depends on its size and on the size of the planet, among other factors. This method suffers from a substantial rate of false positives and confirmation from another method is usually considered necessary. The transit method reveals the radius of a planet, and it has the benefit that it sometimes allows a planet's atmosphere to be investigated through spectroscopy. Because the transit method requires that part of the planet's orbit intersect a line-of-sight between the host star and Earth, the probability that an exoplanet in a randomly oriented orbit will be observed to transit the star is somewhat small.
Number of extrasolar planet discoveries per year through September 2014, with colors indicating method of detection:
As a planet orbits a star, the star also moves in its own small orbit around the system's center of mass. Variations in the star's radial velocity—that is, the speed with which it moves towards or away from Earth—can be detected from displacements in the star's spectral lines due to the Doppler effect. Extremely small radial-velocity variations can be observed, of 1 m/s or even somewhat less.[60] This method has the advantage of being applicable to stars with a wide range of characteristics. One of its disadvantages is that it cannot determine a planet's true mass, but can only set a lower limit on that mass. However, if the radial velocity of the planet itself can be distinguished from the radial velocity of the star, then the true mass can be determined.[61]
When multiple planets are present, each one slightly perturbs the others' orbits. Small variations in the times of transit for one planet can thus indicate the presence of another planet, which itself may or may not transit. For example, variations in the transits of the planet Kepler-19b suggest the existence of a second planet in the system, the non-transiting Kepler-19c.[62][63] If multiple transiting planets exist in one system, then this method can be used to confirm their existence.[64] In another form of the method, timing the eclipses in an eclipsing binary star can reveal an outer planet that orbits both stars; as of August 2013, a few planets have been found in that way with numerous planets confirmed with this method.
Animation showing difference between planet transit timing of 1-planet and 2-planet systems. Credit: NASA/Kepler Mission.
When a planet orbits multiple stars or if the planet has moons, its transit time can significantly vary per transit. Although no new planets or moons have been discovered with this method, it is used to successfully confirm many transiting circumbinary planets.[65]
Microlensing occurs when the gravitational field of a star acts like a lens, magnifying the light of a distant background star. Planets orbiting the lensing star can cause detectable anomalies in the magnification as it varies over time. Unlike most other methods which have detection bias towards planets with small (or for resolved imaging, large) orbits, microlensing method is most sensitive to detecting planets around 1–10 AU away from Sun-like stars.
Astrometry consists of precisely measuring a star's position in the sky and observing the changes in that position over time. The motion of a star due to the gravitational influence of a planet may be observable. Because the motion is so small, however, this method has not yet been very productive. It has produced only a few disputed detections, though it has been successfully used to investigate the properties of planets found in other ways.
Histogram of Exoplanet Discoveries—gold bar displays new planets "verified by multiplicity" (February 26, 2014).
Histogram of exoplanets by size—the gold bars represent Kepler's latest newly verified exoplanets (February 26, 2014).
A pulsar (the small, ultradense remnant of a star that has exploded as a supernova) emits radio waves extremely regularly as it rotates. If planets orbit the pulsar, they will cause slight anomalies in the timing of its observed radio pulses. The first confirmed discovery of an extrasolar planet was made using this method. But as of 2011, it has not been very productive; five planets have been detected in this way, around three different pulsars.
Like pulsars, there are some other types of stars which exhibit periodic activity. Deviations from the periodicity can sometimes be caused by a planet orbiting it. As of 2013, a few planets have been discovered with this method.[66]
When a planet orbits very close to the star, it catches a considerable amount of starlight. As the planet orbits around the star, the amount of light changes due to planets having phases from Earth's viewpoint or planet glowing more from one side than the other due to temperature differences.[67]
Relativistic beaming measures the observed flux from the star due to its motion. The brightness of the star changes as the planet moves closer or further away from its host star.[68]
Massive planets close to their host stars can slightly deform the shape of the star. This causes the brightness of the star to slightly deviate depending how it is rotated relative to Earth.[69]
With polarimetry method, a polarized light reflected off the planet is separated from unpolarized light emitted from the star. No new planets have been discovered with this method although a few already discovered planets have been detected with this method.[70][71]
Disks of space dust surround many stars, believed to originate from collisions among asteroids and comets. The dust can be detected because it absorbs starlight and re-emits it as infrared radiation. Features in the disks may suggest the presence of planets, though this is not considered a definitive detection method.


Proper names

Most exoplanets have catalog names which are explained in the following sections, but in 2014 the IAU launched a process for giving proper names to exoplanets.[72][73] The process involves public nomination and voting for the new names, and the IAU plans to announce the new names in August 2015.[74] The decision to give the planets new names followed the private company Uwingu's exoplanet naming contest, which the IAU harshly criticized.[74] Previously a few planets had received unofficial names: notably Osiris (HD 209458 b), Bellerophon (51 Pegasi b), and Methuselah (PSR B1620-26 b).

Multiple-star standard

The convention for naming exoplanets is an extension of the one used by the Washington Multiplicity Catalog (WMC) for multiple-star systems, and adopted by the International Astronomical Union.[75] The brightest member of a star system receives the letter "A". Distinct components not contained within "A" are labeled "B", "C", etc. Subcomponents are designated by one or more suffixes with the primary label, starting with lowercase letters for the 2nd hierarchical level and then numbers for the 3rd.[76] For example, if there is a triple star system in which two stars orbit each other closely with a third star in a more distant orbit, the two closely orbiting stars would be named Aa and Ab, whereas the distant star would named B. For historical reasons, this standard is not always followed: for example Alpha Centauri A, B and C are not labelled Alpha Centauri Aa, Ab and B.

Extrasolar planet standard

Following an extension of the above standard, an exoplanet's name is normally formed by taking the name of its parent star and adding a lowercase letter. The first planet discovered in a system is given the designation "b" and later planets are given subsequent letters. If several planets in the same system are discovered at the same time, the closest one to the star gets the next letter, followed by the other planets in order of orbital size.

For instance, in the 55 Cancri system the first planet – 55 Cancri b – was discovered in 1996; two additional farther planets were simultaneously discovered in 2002 with the nearest to the star being named 55 Cancri c and the other 55 Cancri d; a fourth planet was claimed (its existence was later disputed) in 2004 and named 55 Cancri e despite lying closer to the star than 55 Cancri b; and the most recently discovered planet, in 2007, was named 55 Cancri f despite lying between 55 Cancri c and 55 Cancri d.[77] As of April 2012 the highest letter in use is "j", for the unconfirmed planet HD 10180 j, and with "h" being the highest letter for a confirmed planet, belonging to the same host star).[5]

If a planet orbits one member of a binary star system, then an uppercase letter for the star will be followed by a lowercase letter for the planet. Examples are 16 Cygni Bb[78] and HD 178911 Bb.[79] Planets orbiting the primary or "A" star should have 'Ab' after the name of the system, as in HD 41004 Ab.[80] However, the "A" is sometimes omitted; for example the first planet discovered around the primary star of the Tau Boötis binary system is usually called simply Tau Boötis b.[81] The star designation is necessary when more than one star in the system has its own planetary system such as in case of WASP-94 A and WASP-94 B.[82]

If the parent star is a single star, then it may still be regarded as having an "A" designation, though the "A" is not normally written. The first exoplanet found to be orbiting such a star could then be regarded as a secondary subcomponent that should be given the suffix "Ab". For example, 51 Peg Aa is the host star in the system 51 Peg; and the first exoplanet is then 51 Peg Ab. Because most exoplanets are in single-star systems, the implicit "A" designation was simply dropped, leaving the exoplanet name with the lower-case letter only: 51 Peg b.

A few exoplanets have been given names that do not conform to the above standard. For example, the planets that orbit the pulsar PSR 1257 are often referred to with capital rather than lowercase letters. Also, the underlying name of the star system itself can follow several different systems. In fact, some stars (such as Kepler-11) have only received their names due to their inclusion in planet-search programs, previously only being referred to by their celestial coordinates.

Circumbinary planets and 2010 proposal

Hessman et al. state that the implicit system for exoplanet names utterly failed with the discovery of circumbinary planets.[75] They note that the discoverers of the two planets around HW Virginis tried to circumvent the naming problem by calling them "HW Vir 3" and "HW Vir 4", i.e. the latter is the 4th object – stellar or planetary – discovered in the system. They also note that the discoverers of the two planets around NN Serpentis were confronted with multiple suggestions from various official sources and finally chose to use the designations "NN Ser c" and "NN Ser d".

The proposal of Hessman et al. starts with the following two rules:

Rule 1. The formal name of an exoplanet is obtained by appending the appropriate suffixes to the formal name of the host star or stellar system. The upper hierarchy is defined by upper-case letters, followed by lower-case letters, followed by numbers, etc. The naming order within a hierarchical level is for the order of discovery only. (This rule corresponds to the present provisional WMC naming convention.)
Rule 2. Whenever the leading capital letter designation is missing, this is interpreted as being an informal form with an implicit "A" unless otherwise explicitly stated. (This rule corresponds to the present exoplanet community usage for planets around single stars.)

They note that under these two proposed rules all of the present names for 99% of the planets around single stars are preserved as informal forms of the IAU sanctioned provisional standard. They would rename Tau Boötis b formally as Tau Boötis Ab, retaining the prior form as an informal usage (using Rule 2, above).

To deal with the difficulties relating to circumbinary planets, the proposal contains two further rules:

Rule 3. As an alternative to the nomenclature standard in Rule 1, a hierarchical relationship can be expressed by concatenating the names of the higher order system and placing them in parentheses, after which the suffix for a lower order system is added.
Rule 4. When in doubt (i.e. if a different name has not been clearly set in the literature), the hierarchy expressed by the nomenclature should correspond to dynamically distinct (sub)systems in order of their dynamical relevance. The choice of hierarchical levels should be made to emphasize dynamical relationships, if known.

They submit that the new form using parentheses is the best for known circumbinary planets and has the desirable effect of giving these planets identical sublevel hierarchical labels and stellar component names that conform to the usage for binary stars. They say that it requires the complete renaming of only two exoplanetary systems: The planets around HW Virginis would be renamed HW Vir (AB) b & (AB) c, whereas those around NN Serpentis would be renamed NN Ser (AB) b & (AB) c. In addition the previously known single circumbinary planets around PSR B1620-26 and DP Leonis) can almost retain their names (PSR B1620-26 b and DP Leonis b) as unofficial informal forms of the "(AB)b" designation where the "(AB)" is left out.

The discoverers of the circumbinary planet around Kepler-16 followed the naming scheme proposed by Hessman et al. when naming the body Kepler-16 (AB)-b, or simply Kepler-16b when there is no ambiguity.[83]

Other naming systems

Another nomenclature, often seen in science fiction, uses Roman numerals in the order of planets' positions from the star. (This was inspired by an old system for naming moons of the outer planets, such as "Jupiter IV" for Callisto.) But such a system is impractical for scientific use, because new planets may be found closer to the star, changing all numerals.

Formation and evolution

Planets form within a few tens of millions of years of their star forming,[84][85][86] and there are stars that are forming today and other stars that are ten billion years old, so unlike the planets of the solar system which can only be observed as they are today, studying exoplanets allows the observation of exoplanets at different stages of evolution. When planets form they have hydrogen envelopes that cool and contract over time and, depending on the mass of the planet, some or all of the hydrogen is eventually lost to space. This means that even terrestrial planets can start off with large radii.[87][88][89] An example is Kepler-51b which has only about twice the mass of Earth but is almost the size of Saturn which is a hundred times the mass of Earth. Kepler-51b is quite young at a few hundred million years old.[90]

  • Co-evolution of atmospheres, life, and climate, John Lee Grenfell et al., 20 May 2010
  • Phase Separation in Giant Planets: Inhomogeneous Evolution of Saturn, Jonathan J. Fortney, William B. Hubbard, 1 May 2003
  • Magnetodynamo Lifetimes for Rocky, Earth-Mass Exoplanets with Contrasting Mantle Convection Regimes, Joost van Summeren, Eric Gaidos, Clinton P. Conrad, 9 Apr 2013
  • The effect of evaporation on the evolution of close-in giant planets, I. Baraffe, F. Selsis, G. Chabrier, T. S. Barman, F. Allard, P.H. Hauschildt, H. Lammer, 5 Apr 2004
  • Observational Evidence for Tidal Destruction of Exoplanets, Brian Jackson, Rory Barnes, Richard Greenberg, 7 Apr 2009
  • A Dying Universe: The Long Term Fate and Evolution of Astrophysical Objects, Fred C. Adams, Gregory Laughlin, 18 Jan 1997

Planet-hosting stars

There is at least one planet on average per star.[3] Around 1 in 5 Sun-like stars[1] have an "Earth-sized"[2] planet in the habitable zone [13]

The Morgan-Keenan spectral classification

Most known exoplanets orbit stars roughly similar to the Sun, that is, main-sequence stars of spectral categories F, G, or K. Lower-mass stars (red dwarfs, of spectral category M) are less likely to have planets massive enough to detect by the radial-velocity method.[91][92] Although several tens of planets around red dwarfs have been discovered by the Kepler spacecraft which uses the transit method which can detect smaller planets.

Stars with a higher metallicity than the Sun are more likely to have planets, especially giant planets, than stars with lower metallicity.[93]

Some planets orbit one member of a binary star system,[94] and several circumbinary planets have been discovered which orbit around both members of binary star. A few planets in triple star systems are known[95] and one in the quadruple system Kepler 64.

Orbital parameters

Most known extrasolar planet candidates have been discovered using indirect methods and therefore only some of their physical and orbital parameters can be determined. For example, out of the six independent parameters that define an orbit, the radial-velocity method can determine four: semi-major axis, eccentricity, longitude of periastron, and time of periastron. Two parameters remain unknown: inclination and longitude of the ascending node.

Distance from star, semi-major axis and orbital period

Diagram showing how a planet and a star orbit their common center of mass (red cross).
Scatterplot showing masses and orbital radii (and period) of all extrasolar planets discovered through September 2014, with colors indicating method of detection:
For reference, Solar System planets are marked as gray circles. The horizontal axis plots the log of the semi-major axis, and the vertical axis plots the log of the mass.

There are exoplanets that are much closer to their parent star than any planet in the Solar System is to the Sun, and there are also exoplanets that are much further from their star. Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun at 0.4 AU, takes 88 days for an orbit, but the smallest known orbits of exoplanets have orbital periods of only a few hours, e.g. Kepler-70b. The Kepler-11 system has five of its planets in smaller orbits than Mercury's. Neptune is 30 AU from the Sun and takes 165 years to orbit it, but there are exoplanets that are thousands of AU from their star and take tens of thousands of years to orbit, e.g. GU Piscium b.[96]

The orbit of a planet is not centered on the star but on their common center of mass (see diagram on right). For circular orbits, the semi-major axis is the distance between the planet and the center of mass of the system. For elliptical orbits, the planet–star distance varies over the course of the orbit, in which case the semi-major axis is the average of the largest and smallest distances between the planet and the center of mass of the system. If the sizes of the star and planet are relatively small compared to the size of the orbit and the orbit is nearly circular and the center of mass is not too far from the star's center, such as in the Earth–Sun system, then the distance from any point on the star to any point on the planet is approximately the same as the semi-major axis. However, when a star's radius expands when it turns into a red giant, then the distance between the planet and the star's surface can become close to zero, or even less than zero if the planet has been engulfed by the expanding red giant, whereas the center of mass from which the semi-major axis is measured will still be near the center of the red giant.

Orbital period is the time taken to complete one orbit. For any given star, the shorter the semi-major axis of a planet, the shorter the orbital period. Also comparing planets around different stars but with the same semi-major axis, the more massive the star, the shorter the orbital period.

Over the lifetime of a star, the semi-major axes of its planets changes. This planetary migration happens especially during the formation of the planetary system when planets interact with the protoplanetary disk and each other until a relatively stable position is reached, and later in the red-giant and asymptotic-giant-branch phases when the star expands and engulfs the nearest planets that can cause them to move inwards, and when the red giant loses mass as the outer layers dissipate causing planets to move outwards as a result of the red giant's reduced gravitational field.

The radial-velocity and transit methods are most sensitive to planets with small orbits. The earliest discoveries such as 51 Peg b were gas giants with orbits of a few days.[91] These "hot Jupiters" likely formed further out and migrated inwards. The Kepler spacecraft has found planets with even shorter orbits of only a few hours, which places them within the star's upper atmosphere or corona, and these planets are Earth-sized or smaller and are probably the left-over solid cores of giant planets that have evaporated due to being so close to the star,[97] or even being engulfed by the star in its red-giant phase in the case of Kepler-70b. As well as evaporation, other reasons why larger planets are unlikely to survive orbits only a few hours long include orbital decay caused by tidal force, tidal-inflation instability, and Roche-lobe overflow.[98] The Roche limit implies that small planets with orbits of a few hours are likely made mostly of iron.[98]

The direct imaging method is most sensitive to planets with large orbits, and has discovered some planets that have planet–star separations of hundreds of AU. However, protoplanetary disks are usually only around 100 AU in radius, and core accretion models predict giant planet formation to be within 10 AU, where the planets can coalesce quickly enough before the disk evaporates. Very-long-period giant planets may have been rogue planets that were captured,[99] or formed close-in and gravitationally scattered outwards, or the planet and star could be a mass-imbalanced wide binary system with the planet being the primary object of its own separate protoplanetary disk. Gravitational instability models might produce planets at multi-hundred AU separations but this would require unusually large disks.[100][101] For planets with very wide orbits up to several hundred thousand AU it may be difficult to observationally determine whether the planet is gravitationally bound to the star.

Most planets that have been discovered are within a couple of AU of their star because the most used methods (radial-velocity and transit) require observation of several orbits to confirm that the planet exists and there has only been enough time since these methods were first used to cover small separations. Some planets with larger orbits have been discovered by direct imaging but there is a middle range of distances, roughly equivalent to the Solar System's gas giant region, which is largely unexplored. Direct imaging equipment for exploring that region is being installed on the world's largest telescopes and should begin operation in 2014. e.g. Gemini Planet Imager and VLT-SPHERE. The microlensing method has detected a few planets in the 1–10 AU range.[102] It appears plausible that in most exoplanetary systems, there are one or two giant planets with orbits comparable in size to those of Jupiter and Saturn in the Solar System. Giant planets with substantially larger orbits are now known to be rare, at least around Sun-like stars.[103]

The distance of the habitable zone from a star depends on the type of star and this distance changes during the star's lifetime as the size and temperature of the star changes.

  • The Fate of Scattered Planets, Benjamin C. Bromley, Scott J. Kenyon, 10 Oct 2014
  • Planetary Populations in the Mass-Period Diagram: A Statistical Treatment of Exoplanet Formation and the Role of Planet Traps, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Ralph E. Pudritz, 8 Oct 2013


The eccentricity of an orbit is a measure of how elliptical (elongated) it is. All the planets of the Solar System except for Mercury have near-circular orbits (e<0.1).[104] Most exoplanets with orbital periods of 20 days or less have near-circular orbits, i.e. very low eccentricity. That is believed to be due to tidal circularization: reduction of eccentricity over time due to gravitational interaction between two bodies. The mostly sub-Neptune-sized planets found by the Kepler spacecraft with short orbital periods have very circular orbits.[16] By contrast, the giant planets with longer orbital periods discovered by radial-velocity methods have quite eccentric orbits. (As of July 2010, 55% of such exoplanets have eccentricities greater than 0.2, whereas 17% have eccentricities greater than 0.5.[5]) Moderate to high eccentricities (e>0.2) of giant planets are not an observational selection effect, because a planet can be detected about equally well regardless of the eccentricity of its orbit. The prevalence of elliptical orbits for giant planets is a major puzzle, because current theories of planetary formation strongly suggest planets should form with circular (that is, non-eccentric) orbits.[44]

However, for weak Doppler signals near the limits of the current detection ability the eccentricity becomes poorly constrained and biased towards higher values. It is suggested that some of the high eccentricities reported for low-mass exoplanets may be overestimates, because simulations show that many observations are also consistent with two planets on circular orbits. Reported observations of single planets in moderately eccentric orbits have about a 15% chance of being a pair of planets.[105] This misinterpretation is especially likely if the two planets orbit with a 2:1 resonance. With the exoplanet sample known in 2009, a group of astronomers has concluded that "(1) around 35% of the published eccentric one-planet solutions are statistically indistinguishable from planetary systems in 2:1 orbital resonance, (2) another 40% cannot be statistically distinguished from a circular orbital solution" and "(3) planets with masses comparable to Earth could be hidden in known orbital solutions of eccentric super-Earths and Neptune mass planets".[106]

Radial velocity surveys found exoplanet orbits beyond 0.1 AU to be eccentric, particularly for large planets. Kepler spacecraft transit data is consistent with the RV surveys and also revealed that smaller planets tend to have less eccentric orbits. [107]

Inclination vs spin–orbit angle

Orbital inclination is the angle between a planet's orbital plane and another plane of reference. For exoplanets the inclination is usually stated with respect to an observer on Earth: the angle used is that between the normal to the planet's orbital plane and the line of sight from Earth to the star. Therefore most planets observed by the transit method are close to 90 degrees.[108] Because the word 'inclination' is used in exoplanet studies for this line-of-sight inclination then the angle between the planet's orbit and the star's rotation must use a different word and is termed the spin–orbit angle or spin–orbit alignment. In most cases the orientation of the star's rotational axis is unknown. The Kepler spacecraft has found a few hundred multi-planet systems and in most of these systems the planets all orbit in nearly the same plane, much like the Solar System.[16] However, a combination of astrometric and radial-velocity measurements has shown that some planetary systems contain planets whose orbital planes are significantly tilted relative to each other.[109] More than half of hot Jupiters have orbital planes substantially misaligned with their parent star's rotation. A substantial fraction of hot-Jupiters even have retrograde orbits, meaning that they orbit in the opposite direction from the star's rotation.[110] Rather than a planet's orbit having been disturbed, it may be that the star itself flipped early in their system's formation due to interactions between the star's magnetic field and the planet-forming disc.[111]

Rotation and axial tilt

Plot of equatorial spin velocity vs mass for planets comparing Beta Pictoris b to the solar system planets. (ESO/I. Snellen (Leiden University))

In April 2014 the first measurement of a planet's rotation period was announced: the length of day for the super-Jupiter gas giant Beta Pictoris b is 8 hours (based on the assumption that the axial tilt of the planet is small.)[112][113][114] With an equatorial rotational velocity of 25 km per second, this spin is faster than the gas giants of the solar system in line with expectation that the more mass a gas giant has the faster it spins. (Dwarf planet Ceres rotates in 5 hours but the smaller radius of Ceres means that a 5-hour rotation period corresponds to an equatorial rotational velocity that is much slower than Beta Pictoris b's velocity.) Beta Pictoris b's distance from its star is 9AU. At such distances the rotation of Jovian planets is not slowed by tidal effects.[115] Beta Pictoris b is still warm and young and over the next hundreds of millions of years, it will cool down and shrink to about the size of Jupiter, and if its angular momentum is preserved then as it shrinks the length of its day will decrease to about 3 hours and its equatorial rotation velocity will speed up to about 40 km per second.[113] The images of Beta Pictoris b do not have high enough resolution to directly see details but doppler spectroscopy techniques were used to show that different parts of the planet were moving at different speeds and in opposite directions from which it was inferred that the planet is rotating.[112] With the next generation of large ground-based telescopes it will be possible to use doppler imaging techniques to make a global map of the planet, like the recent mapping of the brown dwarf Luhman 16B.[116][117]

Origin of spin and tilt of terrestrial planets

Giant impacts have a large effect on the spin of terrestrial planets. The last few giant impacts during planetary formation tend to be the main determiner of a terrestrial planet's rotation rate. On average the spin angular velocity will be about 70% of the velocity that would cause the planet to break up and fly apart; the natural outcome of planetary embryo impacts at speeds slightly larger than escape velocity. In later stages terrestrial planet spin is also affected by impacts with planetesimals. During the giant impact stage, the thickness of a protoplanetary disk is far larger than the size of planetary embryos so collisions are equally likely to come from any direction in three-dimensions. This results in the axial tilt of accreted planets ranging from 0 to 180 degrees with any direction as likely as any other with both prograde and retrograde spins equally probable. Therefore prograde spin with small axial tilt, common for the solar system's terrestrial planets except for Venus, is not common in general for terrestrial planets built by giant impacts. The initial axial tilt of a planet determined by giant impacts can be substantially changed by stellar tides if the planet is close to its star and by satellite tides if the planet has a large satellite.[118]

Tidal effects

For most planets the rotation period and axial tilt (also called obliquity) are not known, but a large number of planets have been detected with very short orbits (where tidal effects are greater) and will probably have reached an equilibrium rotation that can be predicted.

Tidal effects are the result of forces acting on a body differing from one part of the body to another.[115] For example the gravitational effect of a star varies with distance from one side of a planet to another. Also heat from a star creates a temperature gradient between the day and nightsides which is another source of tides. For example, on Earth, air pressure variations on the ground are affected more by temperature differences than gravitational ones.

Tides modify the rotation and orbit of planets until an equilibrium is reached. Whenever the rotation rate is slowed, there is an increase of the orbit semi-major axis due to the conservation of angular momentum. Most of the large moons in the Solar System, including the Moon, are tidally locked to their host planet; the same side of the moon is always facing the planet. This means the moons' rotation periods are synchronous with their orbital period. However when an orbit is eccentric, as is the case with many exoplanets' orbits of their host stars, there are equilibrium states such as spin-orbit resonances that are far more likely than synchronous rotation. A spin–orbit resonance is when the rotation period and the orbital period are in an integer ratio - this is called a commensurability. Non-resonant equilibriums such as the retrograde rotation of Venus can also occur when both gravitational and thermal atmospheric tides are both significant.

A synchronous tidal lock isn't necessarily particularly slow - there are planets with orbits that take only a few hours.

Gravitational tides tend to reduce the axial tilt to zero but over a longer time-scale than the rotation rate reaches equilibrium. However, the presence of multiple planets in a system can cause axial tilt to be captured in a resonance called a Cassini state. There are small oscillations around this state and in the case of Mars these axial tilt variations are chaotic.

Hot Jupiters' close proximity to their host star means that their spin-orbit evolution is mostly due to the star's gravity and not the other effects. Hot Jupiters rotation rate is not thought to be captured into spin-orbit resonance due to way fluid-body reacts to tides, and therefore slows down to synchronous rotation if it is on a circular orbit or slows to a non-synchronous rotation if on an eccentric orbit. Hot Jupiters are likely to evolve towards zero axial tilt even if they had been in a Cassini state during planetary migration when they were further from their star. Hot Jupiters' orbits will become more circular over time, however the presence of other planets in the system on eccentric orbits, even ones as small as Earth and as far away as the habitable zone, can continue to maintain the eccentricity of the Hot Jupiter so that the length of time for tidal circularization can be billions instead of millions of years.

The rotation rate of planet HD 80606 b is predicted to be about 1.9 days. HD 80606 b avoids spin-orbit resonance because it is a gas giant. The eccentricity of its orbit means that it avoids becoming tidally locked.

Physical parameters


When a planet is found by the radial-velocity method, its orbital inclination i is unknown and can range from 0 to 90 degrees. The method is unable to determine the true mass (M) of the planet, but rather gives a lower limit for its mass, M sini. In a few cases an apparent exoplanet may be a more massive object such as a brown dwarf or red dwarf. However, the probability of a small value of i (say less than 30 degrees, which would give a true mass at least double the observed lower limit) is relatively low (1−(√3)/2 ≈ 13%) and hence most planets will have true masses fairly close to the observed lower limit.[91]

If a planet's orbit is nearly perpendicular to the line of vision (i.e. i close to 90°), a planet can be detected through the transit method. The inclination will then be known, and the inclination combined with M sini from radial-velocity will give the planet's true mass.

Also, astrometric observations and dynamical considerations in multiple-planet systems can sometimes provide an upper limit to the planet's true mass.

The mass of a transiting exoplanet can also be determined from the transmission spectrum of its atmosphere, as it can be used to constrain independently the atmospheric composition, temperature, pressure, and scale height.[119]

Transit-timing variation can also be used to find planets' masses.[120]

Radius, density and bulk composition

Prior to recent results from the Kepler spacecraft most confirmed planets were gas giants comparable in size to Jupiter or larger because they are most easily detected. However, the planets detected by Kepler are mostly between the size of Neptune and the size of Earth.[16]

If a planet is detectable by both the radial-velocity and the transit methods, then both its true mass and its radius can be found. The planet's density can then be calculated. Planets with low density are inferred to be composed mainly of hydrogen and helium, whereas planets of intermediate density are inferred to have water as a major constituent. A planet of high density is inferred to be rocky, like Earth and the other terrestrial planets of the Solar System.

Sizes of Kepler Planet Candidates – based on 2,740 candidates orbiting 2,036 stars as of 4 November 2013 (NASA).
Comparison of sizes of planets with different compositions.

Gas giants, puffy planets, and super-Jupiters

Size comparison of WASP-17b (right) with Jupiter (left).

Gaseous planets that are hot because they are close to their star or because they are still hot from their formation are expanded by the heat. For colder gas planets there is a maximum radius which is slightly larger than Jupiter which occurs when the mass reaches a few Jupiter-masses. Adding mass beyond this point causes the radius to shrink.[121][122][123]

Even when taking heating from the star into account, many transiting exoplanets are much larger than expected given their mass, meaning that they have surprisingly low density.[124] See the magnetic field section for one possible explanation.

Plots of exoplanet density and radius.[5] Top:Density vs Radius. Bottom: Diffusity=1/Density vs Radius. Units: Radius in RJup. Density in g/cm3. Diffusity in cm3/g. These plots show that there are a wide range of densities for planets between Earth and Neptune size, then the planets of 0.6RJup size are very low-density and there are very few of them, then the gas giants have a large range of densities.

Besides those inflated hot Jupiters there is another type of low-density planet: occurring at around 0.6 times the size of Jupiter where there are very few planets. The planets around Kepler-51[90] are far less dense (far more diffuse) than the inflated hot Jupiters as can be seen in the plots on the right where the three Kepler-51 planets stand out in the diffusity vs radius plot. A more detailed study taking into account star spots may modify these results to produce less extreme values.[90]

Ice giants and super-Neptunes

Kepler-101b is the first super-Neptune planet. It has three times Neptune's mass but a Neptune-like composition with more than 60% heavy elements unlike hydrogen/helium-dominated gas giants.[125]

Super-Earths, mini-Neptunes, and gas dwarfs

If a planet has a radius and/or mass between that of Earth and Neptune then there is a question about whether the planet is rocky like Earth, a mixture of volatiles and gas like Neptune, a small planet with a hydrogen/helium envelope (mini-Jupiter), or of some other composition.

Some of the Kepler transiting planets with radii in the range 1–4 Earth radii have had their masses measured by radial-velocity or transit-timing methods. The calculated densities show that up to 1.5 Earth radii, these planets are rocky and that density increases with increasing radius due to gravitational compression. However, between 1.5 and 4 Earth radii the density decreases with increasing radius. This indicates that above 1.5 Earth radii planets tend to have increasing amounts of volatiles and gas. Despite this general trend there is a wide range of masses at a given radius, which could be because gas planets can have rocky cores of different masses or compositions[126] and could also be due to photoevaporation of volatiles.[127] Thermal evolutionary atmosphere models suggest a radius of 1.75 times that of Earth as a dividing line between rocky and gaseous planets.[128] Excluding close-in planets that have lost their gas envelope due to stellar irradiation, studies of the metallicity of stars suggest a dividing line of 1.7 Earth radii between rocky planets and gas dwarfs; then another dividing line at 3.9 Earth radii between gas dwarfs and gas giants. These dividing lines are statistical trends and do not necessarily apply to specific planets because there are many other factors besides metallicity that affect planet formation, including distance from star - there may be larger rocky planets formed at larger distances.[129]

The discovery of the low-density Earth-mass planet Kepler-138d shows that there is an overlapping range of masses in which both rocky planets and low-density planets occur.[130] Low-mass low-density planets could be ocean planets or super-Earths with a remnant hydrogen atmosphere, or hot planets with a steam atmosphere, or mini-Neptunes with a hydrogen-helium atmosphere.[131] Other possibilities for low-mass low-density planets are large atmospheres of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, or nitrogen.[132]

Massive solid planets

Size comparison of Kepler-10c with Earth and Neptune

In 2014, new measurements of Kepler-10c found that it was a Neptune-mass planet (17 Earth masses) with a density higher than Earth's, indicating that Kepler-10c is made mostly of rock with possibly up to 20% high-pressure water-ice but without a hydrogen-dominated envelope. As it is well above the 10 Earth mass upper limit that is commonly used for the term 'super-Earth', the term mega-Earth has been proposed.[133] A similarly massive and dense planet could be Kepler-131b, although its density is not as well measured as that of Kepler 10c. The next most massive known solid planets are half this mass: 55 Cancri e and Kepler-20b.[134]

Gas planets can also have large solid cores: the Saturn-mass planet HD 149026 b has only two-thirds of Saturn's radius so may have a rock–ice core of 60 Earth masses or more.[123]

Transit-timing variation measurements indicate that Kepler-52b, Kepler-52c and Kepler-57b have maximum-masses between 30 and 100 times the mass of Earth, although the actual masses could be much lower. With radii about 2 Earth radii in size, they might have densities larger than an iron planet of the same size. They orbit very close to their stars so they could be the remnant cores (chthonian planets) of evaporated gas giants or brown dwarfs. If cores are massive enough they could remain compressed for billions of years despite losing the atmospheric mass.[135][136]

Solid planets up to thousands of Earth masses may be able to form around massive stars (B-type and O-type stars; 5–120 solar masses), where the protoplanetary disk would contain enough heavy elements. Also, these stars have high UV radiation and winds that could photoevaporate the gas in the disk, leaving just the heavy elements.[137] For comparison, Neptune's mass equals 17 Earth masses, Jupiter has 318 Earth masses, and the 13 Jupiter-mass limit used in the IAU's working definition of an exoplanet equals approximately 4000 Earth masses.[137]

Another way of forming massive solid planets is when a white dwarf in a close binary system loses material to a companion neutron star. The white dwarf can be reduced to planetary-mass, leaving just its crystallised carbon–oxygen core. A likely example of this is PSR J1719-1438 b.

Cold planets have a maximum radius because adding more mass at that point causes the planet to compress under the weight instead of increasing the radius. The maximum radius for solid planets is smaller than the maximum radius for gas planets.[137]


When the size of a planet is described using its radius this is approximating the shape by a sphere. However, the rotation of a planet causes it to be flattened at the poles so that the equatorial radius is larger than the polar radius, making it closer to an oblate spheroid. The oblateness of transiting exoplanets will affect the transit light curves. At the limits of current technology it has been possible to show that HD 189733b is less oblate than Saturn.[138] If the planet is close to its star, then gravitational tides will elongate the planet in the direction of the star, so that the planet will be closer to a triaxial ellipsoid.[139] Because tidal deformation is along a line between the planet and the star, it is difficult to detect from transit photometry—it will have an order of magnitude less effect on the transit light curves than that caused by rotational deformation even in cases where the tidal deformation is larger than rotational deformation (such as is the case for tidally locked hot Jupiters).[138] Material rigidity of rocky planets and rocky cores of gas planets will cause further deviations from the aforementioned shapes.[138] Thermal tides caused by unevenly irradiated surfaces are another factor.[140]


Sunset studies on Titan by Cassini - helps better understand exoplanet atmospheres (artist concept; May 27, 2014).

As of February 2014, more than fifty transiting and five directly imaged exoplanet atmospheres have been observed,[141] resulting in detection of molecular spectral features; observation of day–night temperature gradients; and constraints on vertical atmospheric structure.[142] Also, an atmosphere has been detected on the non-transiting hot Jupiter Tau Boötis b.[143][144]

Spectroscopic measurements can be used to study a transiting planet's atmospheric composition,[145] temperature, pressure, and scale height, and hence can be used to determine its mass.[119]

Stellar light is polarized by atmospheric molecules; this could be detected with a polarimeter. HD 189733 b has been studied by polarimetry.

Extrasolar planets have phases similar to the phases of the Moon. By observing the exact variation of brightness with phase, astronomers can calculate atmospheric-particle sizes.

Atmospheric composition

In 2001 sodium was detected in the atmosphere of HD 209458 b.[146]

In 2008 water, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide[147] and methane[148] were detected in the atmosphere of HD 189733 b.

In 2013 water was detected in the atmospheres of HD 209458 b, XO-1b, WASP-12b, WASP-17b, and WASP-19b.[149][150][151]

In July, 2014, NASA announced finding very dry atmospheres on three exoplanets (HD 189733b, HD 209458b, WASP-12b) orbiting Sun-like stars.[152]

In September 2014, NASA reported that HAT-P-11b is the first Neptune-sized exoplanet known to have a relatively cloud-free atmosphere and, as well, the first time molecules of any kind have been found, specifically water vapor, on such a relatively small exoplanet.[153]

The presence of oxygen may be detectable by ground-based telescopes,[154] which, if discovered, would suggest the presence of life on an exoplanet.

Atmospheric circulation

The atmospheric circulation of planets that rotate more slowly or have a thicker atmosphere allows more heat to flow to the poles which reduces the temperature differences between the poles and the equator.[155]


In October 2013, the detection of clouds in the atmosphere of Kepler-7b was announced,[156][157] and, in December 2013, also in the atmospheres of GJ 436 b and GJ 1214 b.[158][159][160][161]


Precipitation in the form of liquid (rain) or solid (snow) varies in composition depending on atmospheric temperature, pressure, composition, and altitude. Hot atmospheres could have iron rain,[162] molten-glass rain,[163] and rain made from rocky minerals such as enstatite, corundum, spinel, and wollastonite.[164] Deep in the atmospheres of gas giants it could rain diamonds[165] and helium containing dissolved neon.[166]

Abiotic oxygen

The processes of life result in a mixture of chemicals that are not in chemical equilibrium but there are also abiotic disequilibrium processes that need to be considered. The most robust atmospheric biosignature is often considered to be molecular oxygen O2 and its photochemical byproduct ozone O3. The photolysis of water H2O by UV rays followed by hydrodynamic escape of hydrogen can lead to a build-up of oxygen in planets close to their star undergoing runaway greenhouse effect. For planets in the habitable zone it was believed that water photolysis would be strongly limited by cold-trapping of water vapour in the lower atmosphere. However the extent of H2O cold-trapping depends strongly on the amount of non-condensible gases in the atmosphere such as nitrogen N2 and argon. In the absence of such gases the likelihood of build-up of oxygen also depends in complex ways on the planet’s accretion history, internal chemistry, atmospheric dynamics and orbital state. Therefore, oxygen on its own cannot be considered a robust biosignature.[167] The ratio of nitrogen and argon to oxygen could be detected by studying thermal phase curves[168] or by transit transmission spectroscopy measurement of the spectral Rayleigh scattering slope in a clear-sky (i.e. aerosol-free) atmosphere.[169]


  • Atmospheric Circulation of Exoplanets, Adam P. Showman, James Y-K. Cho, Kristen Menou, 16 Nov 2009
  • New Technique Could Measure Exoplanet Atmospheric Pressure, an Indicator of Habitability, Shannon Hall on March 6, 2014, www.universetoday.com


Surface composition

Surface features can be distinguished from atmospheric features by comparing emission and reflection spectroscopy with transmission spectroscopy. Mid-infrared spectroscopy of exoplanets may detect rocky surfaces, and near-infrared may identify magma oceans or high-temperature lavas, hydrated silicate surfaces and water ice, giving an unambiguous method to distinguish between rocky and gaseous exoplanets.[170]

Surface temperature

One can estimate the temperature of an exoplanet based on the intensity of the light it receives from its parent star. For example, the planet OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb is estimated to have a surface temperature of roughly −220 °C (50 K). However, such estimates may be substantially in error because they depend on the planet's usually unknown albedo, and because factors such as the greenhouse effect may introduce unknown complications. A few planets have had their temperature measured by observing the variation in infrared radiation as the planet moves around in its orbit and is eclipsed by its parent star. For example, the planet HD 189733b has been found to have an average temperature of 1205±9 K (932±9 °C) on its dayside and 973±33 K (700±33 °C) on its nightside.[171]

Surface mapping

  • Global Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets from Scattered Light Curves, Hajime Kawahara, Yuka Fujii, 16 Jul 2010
  • A Two-Dimensional Infrared Map of the Extrasolar Planet HD 189733b, C. Majeau, E. Agol, N. Cowan, 19 Sep 2012

General features

Color and brightness

This color–color diagram compares the colors of planets in our solar system to exoplanet HD 189733b. The exoplanet's deep blue color is produced by silicate droplets, which scatter blue light in its atmosphere.

In 2013 the color of an exoplanet was found for the first time. The best-fit albedo measurements of HD 189733b suggest that it is deep dark blue.[172][173]

The apparent brightness (apparent magnitude) of a planet depends on how far away the observer is, how reflective the planet is (albedo), and how much light the planet receives from its star, which depends on how far the planet is from the star and how bright the star is. The darkest known planet in terms of geometric albedo is TrES-2b, a hot Jupiter that reflects less than 1% of the light from its star, making it less reflective than coal or black acrylic paint. Hot Jupiters are expected to be quite dark due to sodium and potassium in their atmospheres but it is not known why TrES-2b is so dark—it could be due to an unknown chemical.[174][175][176]

Magnetic field

Interaction between a close-in planet's magnetic field and a star can produce spots on the star in a similar way to how the Galilean moons produce aurorae on Jupiter.[177] Auroral radio emissions could be detected with radio telescopes such as LOFAR.[178][179] The radio emissions could enable determination of the rotation rate of a planet which is difficult to detect otherwise.[180]

Earth's magnetic field results from its flowing liquid metallic core, but in super-Earths the mass can produce high pressures with large viscosities and high melting temperatures which could prevent the interiors from separating into different layers and so result in undifferentiated coreless mantles. Magnesium oxide, which is rocky on Earth, can be a liquid metal at the pressures and temperatures found in super-Earths and could generate a magnetic field in the mantles of super-Earths.[181]

Hot Jupiters have been observed to have a larger radius than expected. This could be caused by the interaction between the stellar wind and the planet's magnetosphere creating an electric current through the planet that heats it up causing it to expand. The more magnetically active a star is the greater the stellar wind and the larger the electric current leading to more heating and expansion of the planet. This theory matches the observation that stellar activity is correlated with inflated planetary radii.[182]

Plate tectonics

On Earth-sized planets, plate tectonics is more likely if there are oceans of water; however, in 2007 two independent teams of researchers came to opposing conclusions about the likelihood of plate tectonics on larger super-earths[183][184] with one team saying that plate tectonics would be episodic or stagnant[185] and the other team saying that plate tectonics is very likely on super-earths even if the planet is dry.[186]

If super-earths have more than 80 times as much water as Earth then they become ocean planets with all land completely submerged. However, if there is less water than this limit, then the deep water cycle will move enough water between the oceans and mantle to allow continents to exist.[187][188]


The star 1SWASP J140747.93-394542.6 is orbited by an object that is circled by a ring system much larger than Saturn's rings. However, the mass of the object is not known; it could be a brown dwarf or low-mass star instead of a planet.[189][190]

The brightness of optical images of Fomalhaut b could be due to starlight reflecting off a circumplanetary ring system with a radius between 20 to 40 times that of Jupiter's radius, about the size of the orbits of the Galilean moons.[191]

The rings of the Solar System's gas giants are aligned with their planet's equator. However for exoplanets that orbit close to their star, tidal forces from the star would lead to the outermost rings of a planet being aligned with the planet's orbital plane around the star. A planet's innermost rings would still be aligned with the planet's equator so that if the planet has a tilted rotational axis, then the different alignments between the inner and outer rings would create a warped ring system.[192]


In December 2013 a candidate exomoon of a rogue planet was announced.[193]

Comet-like tails

KIC 12557548 b is a small rocky planet, very close to it star, that is evaporating and leaving a trailing tail of cloud and dust like a comet.[194] The dust could be ash erupting from volcanoes and escaping due to the small planet's low surface-gravity, or it could be from metals that are vaporized by the high temperatures of being so close to the star with the metal vapor then condensing into dust.[195]


  • Detecting Volcanism on Extrasolar Planets, L. Kaltenegger, W. G. Henning, D. D. Sasselov, 7 Sep 2010
  • Detecting planetary geochemical cycles on exoplanets: Atmospheric signatures and the case of SO2, L. Kaltenegger, D. Sasselov, 17 Nov 2009
  • Geodynamics and Rate of Volcanism on Massive Earth-like Planets, Edwin S. Kite, Michael Manga, Eric Gaidos, 31 May 2009
  • Tidal Heating of Terrestrial Extra-Solar Planets and Implications for their Habitability, Brian Jackson, Rory Barnes, Richard Greenberg, 20 Aug 2008

Interior structure

  • Planetary internal structures, I. Baraffe, G. Chabrier, J. Fortney, C. Sotin, 19 Jan 2014


Habitable zone

The habitable zone around a star is the region where the temperature is just right to allow liquid water to exist on a planet; that is, not too close to the star for the water to evaporate and not too far away from the star for the water to freeze. The heat produced by stars varies depending on the size and age of the star so that the habitable zone can be at different distances. Also, the atmospheric conditions on the planet influence the planet's ability to retain heat so that the location of the habitable zone is also specific to each type of planet: desert planets (also known as dry planets), with very little water, will have less water vapor in the atmosphere than Earth and so have a reduced greenhouse effect, meaning that a desert planet could maintain oases of water closer to its star than Earth is to the Sun. The lack of water also means there is less ice to reflect heat into space, so the outer edge of desert-planet habitable zones is further out.[196][197] Rocky planets with a thick hydrogen atmosphere could maintain surface water much further out than the Earth–Sun distance.[198]

Planetary rotation rate is one of the major factors determining the circulation of the atmosphere and hence the pattern of clouds: slowly rotating planets create thick clouds that reflect more and so can be habitable much closer to their star. Earth with its current atmosphere would be habitable in Venus's orbit, if it had Venus's slow rotation, so Venus must have had a higher rotation rate in the past if it lost its water ocean as a result of going through a runaway greenhouse effect, but if Venus never had an ocean because water vapor was lost to space during its formation before it could cool to form an ocean,[199] Venus could have had its slow rotation throughout its history.[200]

Habitable zones have usually been defined in terms of surface temperature, however over half of Earth's biomass is from subsurface microbes,[201] and the temperature increases as you go deeper underground, so the subsurface can be conducive for life when the surface is frozen and if this is considered, the habitable zone extends much further from the star,[202] even rogue planets could have liquid water at sufficient depths underground.[203] In an earlier era of the universe the temperature of the cosmic microwave background would have allowed any rocky planets that existed to have liquid water on their surface regardless of their distance from a star.[204] Jupiter-like planets might not be habitable, but they could have habitable moons.

  • Habitable Zones Around Main-Sequence Stars: Dependence on Planetary Mass, Ravi kumar Kopparapu, Ramses M. Ramirez, James SchottelKotte, James F. Kasting, Shawn Domagal-Goldman, Vincent Eymet, 21 Apr 2014
  • Stabilizing Cloud Feedback Dramatically Expands the Habitable Zone of Tidally Locked Planets, Jun Yang, Nicolas B. Cowan, Dorian S. Abbot, 1 Jul 2013

Ice ages and snowball states

The outer edge of the habitable zone is where planets will be completely frozen but even planets well inside the HZ can periodically become frozen. If orbital fluctuations or other causes produce cooling then this creates more ice but ice reflects sunlight causing even more cooling creating a feedback loop until the planet is completely or nearly completely frozen. When the surface is frozen this stops carbon dioxide weathering resulting in a build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from volcanic emissions. This creates a greenhouse effect which unfreezes the planet again. Planets with a large axial tilt[205] are less likely to enter snowball states and can retain liquid water further from their star. Large fluctuations of axial tilt can have even more of a warming effect than a fixed large tilt.[206][207] Paradoxically planets around cooler stars, such as red dwarfs, are less likely to enter snowball states because the infrared radiation emitted by cooler stars is mostly at wavelengths that are absorbed by ice which heats it up.[208][209]

Tidal heating

If a planet has an eccentric orbit then tidal heating can provide another source of energy besides stellar irradiation. This means that eccentric planets in the radiative habitable zone can be too hot for liquid water (Tidal Venus). Tides also circularize orbits over time so there could be planets in the habitable zone with circular orbits that have no water because they used to have eccentric orbits.[210] Eccentric planets further out than the radiative habitable zone would still have frozen surfaces but the tidal heating could create a subsurface ocean similar to Europa's.[211] In some planetary systems, such as in the Upsilon Andromedae system, the eccentricity of orbits is maintained or even periodically varied by perturbations from other planets in the system. Tidal heating can cause outgassing from the mantle, contributing to the formation and replenishment of an atmosphere.[212]

Potentially habitable planets

Confirmed planet discoveries in the habitable zone include the Kepler-22b, the first super-Earth located in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star.[213] In September 2012, the discovery of two planets orbiting the red dwarf Gliese 163[214] was announced.[215][216] One of the planets, Gliese 163 c, about 6.9 times the mass of Earth and somewhat hotter, was considered to be within the habitable zone.[215][216] In 2013, three more potentially habitable planets, Kepler-62 e, Kepler-62 f, and Kepler-69 c, orbiting Kepler-62 and Kepler-69 respectively, were discovered.[217][218] All three planets were super-Earths[217] and may be covered by oceans thousands of kilometers deep.[219]

Earth-size planets

In November 2013 it was announced that 22±8% of Sun-like[1] stars have an Earth-sized[2] planet in the habitable[3] zone.[12][13] Assuming 200 billion stars in the Milky Way,[4] that would be 11 billion potentially habitable Earths, rising to 40 billion if red dwarfs are included.[14]

Kepler-186f is the first Earth-sized planet in a habitable zone to have been discovered, a 1.1 Earth radius planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf, announced in April 2014.

In February 2013, researchers calculated that up to 6% of small red dwarfs may have planets with Earth-like properties. This suggests that the closest "alien Earth" to the Solar System could be 13 light-years away. The estimated distance increases to 21 light-years when a 95 percent confidence interval is used.[220] In March 2013 a revised estimate based on a more accurate consideration of the size of the habitable zone around red dwarfs gave an occurrence rate of 50% for Earth-size planets in the HZ of red dwarfs.[221]

Cultural impact

On May 9, 2013, a congressional hearing by two United States House of Representatives subcommittees discussed "Exoplanet Discoveries: Have We Found Other Earths?", prompted by the discovery of exoplanet Kepler-62f, along with Kepler-62e and Kepler-62c. A related special issue of the journal Science, published earlier, described the discovery of the exoplanets.[222]

See also


  1. ^ a b c For the purpose of this 1 in 5 statistic, "Sun-like" means G-type star. Data for Sun-like stars wasn't available so this statistic is an extrapolation from data about K-type stars
  2. ^ a b c For the purpose of this 1 in 5 statistic, Earth-sized means 1–2 Earth radii
  3. ^ a b For the purpose of this 1 in 5 statistic, "habitable zone" means the region with 0.25 to 4 times Earth's stellar flux (corresponding to 0.5–2 AU for the Sun).
  4. ^ a b About 1/4 of stars are GK Sun-like stars. The number of stars in the galaxy is not accurately known, but assuming 200 billion stars in total, the Milky Way would have about 50 billion Sun-like (GK) stars, of which about 1 in 5 (22%) or 11 billion would be Earth-sized in the habitable zone. Including red dwarfs would increase this to 40 billion.
  5. ^ Data from NASA catalog July 2014 http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/ExoTables/nph-exotbls?dataset=planets excluding objects described as having unphysically high density


  1. ^ Claven, W. (3 January 2013). "Billions and Billions of Planets".  
  2. ^ Staff (2 January 2013). "100 Billion Alien Planets Fill Our Milky Way Galaxy: Study".  
  3. ^ a b c Cassan, A.; et al.; Beaulieu, J. P.; Dominik, M; Horne, K; Greenhill, J; Wambsganss, J; Menzies, J; Williams, A; Jørgensen, U. G.; Udalski, A; Bennett, D. P.; Albrow, M. D.; Batista, V; Brillant, S; Caldwell, J. A.; Cole, A; Coutures, Ch; Cook, K. H.; Dieters, S; Prester, D. D.; Donatowicz, J; Fouqué, P; Hill, K; Kains, N; Kane, S; Marquette, J. B.; Martin, R; Pollard, K. R.; Sahu, K. C. (2012). "One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations".  
  4. ^ "Planet Population is Plentiful".  
  5. ^ a b c d Schneider, J. "Interactive Extra-solar Planets Catalog".  
  6. ^ Beichman, C.; Gelino, Christopher R.; Kirkpatrick, J. Davy; Cushing, Michael C.; Dodson-Robinson, Sally et al. (2014). "WISE Y Dwarfs As Probes of the Brown Dwarf-Exoplanet Connection".  
  7. ^ a b "NASA - Kepler". Retrieved 4 November 2013. 
  8. ^ a b Harrington, J. D.; Johnson, M. (4 November 2013). "NASA Kepler Results Usher in a New Era of Astronomy". 
  9. ^ Tenenbaum, Peter; Jenkins, Jon M.; Seader, Shawn; Burke, Christopher J.; Christiansen, Jessie L.; Rowe, Jason F.; Caldwell, Douglas A.; Clarke, Bruce D. et al. (2012). "Detection of Potential Transit Signals in the First Twelve Quarters of Kepler Mission Data". arXiv:1212.2915 [astro-ph.EP].
  10. ^ "My God, it's full of planets! They should have sent a poet." (Press release). Planetary Habitability Laboratory, University of Puerto Rico at Arecibo. 3 January 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2013. 
  11. ^ Santerne, A.; Díaz, R. F.; Almenara, J.-M.; Lethuillier, A.; Deleuil, M.; Moutou, C. (2013). "Astrophysical false positives in exoplanet transit surveys: Why do we need bright stars?". arXiv:1310.2133 [astro-ph.EP].
  12. ^ a b Sanders, R. (4 November 2013). "Astronomers answer key question: How common are habitable planets?". newscenter.berkeley.edu. 
  13. ^ a b c Petigura, E. A.; Howard, A. W.; Marcy, G. W. (2013). "Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars".  
  14. ^ a b Khan, Amina (4 November 2013). "Milky Way may host billions of Earth-size planets".  
  15. ^ Strigari, L. E.; Barnabè, M.; Marshall, P. J.; Blandford, R. D. (2012). "Nomads of the Galaxy".   estimates 700 objects >10−6 solar masses (roughly the mass of Mars) per main-sequence star between 0.08 and 1 Solar mass, of which there are billions in the Milky Way.
  16. ^ a b c d e Johnson, Michele; Harrington, J.D. (26 February 2014). "NASA's Kepler Mission Announces a Planet Bonanza, 715 New Worlds".  
  17. ^ Wall, Mike. "Population of Known Alien Planets Nearly Doubles as NASA Discovers 715 New Worlds". Retrieved 26 February 2014. 
  18. ^ "Kepler telescope bags huge haul of planets". Retrieved 27 February 2014. 
  19. ^ Staff. "DENIS-P J082303.1-491201 b".  
  20. ^ Sahlmann, J.; Lazorenko, P. F.; Ségransan, D.; Martín, E. L.; Queloz, D.; Mayor, M.; Udry, S. (August 2013). "Astrometric orbit of a low-mass companion to an ultracool dwarf".  
  21. ^ a b Wolszczan, A.; Frail, D. A. (1992). "A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12". Nature 355 (6356): 145.  
  22. ^ "IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes". 2006. Retrieved 2010-04-25. 
  23. ^ R. R. Brit (2006). "Why Planets Will Never Be Defined".  
  24. ^ """Working Group on Extrasolar Planets: Definition of a "Planet. IAU position statement. 28 February 2003. Retrieved 2014-11-23. 
  25. ^ Mordasini, C. et al.; Alibert; Benz; Naef (2007). "Giant Planet Formation by Core Accretion". arXiv:0710.5667v1 [astro-ph].
  26. ^ Baraffe, I.; Chabrier, G.; Barman, T. (2008). "Structure and evolution of super-Earth to super-Jupiter exoplanets. I. Heavy element enrichment in the interior". Astronomy and Astrophysics 482 (1): 315–332.  
  27. ^ a b Bodenheimer, P.; D'Angelo, G.; Lissauer, J. J.; Fortney, J. J.; Saumon, D. (2013). "Deuterium Burning in Massive Giant Planets and Low-mass Brown Dwarfs Formed by Core-nucleated Accretion". The Astrophysical Journal 770 (2): 120 (13 pp.).  
  28. ^ Bouchy, F.; et al.; Udry, S.; Delfosse, X.; Boisse, I.; Desort, M.; Bonfils, X.; Eggenberger, A.; Ehrenreich, D.; Forveille, T.; Lagrange, A. M.; Le Coroller, H.; Lovis, C.; Moutou, C.; Pepe, F.; Perrier, C.; Pont, F.; Queloz, D.; Santos, N. C.; Ségransan, D.; Vidal-Madjar, A. (2009). "The SOPHIE search for northern extrasolar planets. I. A companion around HD 16760 with mass close to the planet–brown-dwarf transition". Astronomy and Astrophysics 505 (2): 853–858.  
  29. ^ Boss, Alan P.; Basri, Gibor; Kumar, Shiv S.; Liebert, James; Martín, Eduardo L.; Reipurth, Bo; Zinnecker, Hans (2003), "Nomenclature: Brown Dwarfs, Gas Giant Planets, and ?", Brown Dwarfs 211: 529,  
  30. ^ An Analysis of the SEEDS High-Contrast Exoplanet Survey: Massive Planets or Low-Mass Brown Dwarfs?, Timothy D. Brandt, Michael W. McElwain, Edwin L. Turner, Kyle Mede, David S. Spiegel, Masayuki Kuzuhara, Joshua E. Schlieder, John P. Wisniewski, L. Abe, W. Brandner, J. Carson, T. Currie, S. Egner, M. Feldt, T. Golota, M. Goto, C. A. Grady, O. Guyon, J. Hashimoto, Y. Hayano, M. Hayashi, S. Hayashi, T. Henning, K. W. Hodapp, S. Inutsuka, M. Ishii, M. Iye, M. Janson, R. Kandori, G. R. Knapp, T. Kudo, N. Kusakabe, J. Kwon, T. Matsuo, S. Miyama, J.-I. Morino, A. Moro-Martín, T. Nishimura, T.-S. Pyo, E. Serabyn, H. Suto, R. Suzuki, M. Takami, N. Takato, H. Terada, C. Thalmann, D. Tomono, M. Watanabe, T. Yamada, H. Takami, T. Usuda, M. Tamura, (Submitted on 21 Apr 2014)
  31. ^ Spiegel; Adam Burrows; Milsom (2010). "The Deuterium-Burning Mass Limit for Brown Dwarfs and Giant Planets". arXiv:1008.5150 [astro-ph.EP].
  32. ^ Schneider, J.; Dedieu, C.; Le Sidaner, P.; Savalle, R.; Zolotukhin, I. (2011). "Defining and cataloging exoplanets: The exoplanet.eu database".  
  33. ^ Jason T Wright; Fakhouri, Onsi; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Han, Eunkyu; Feng, Ying; John Asher Johnson; Howard, Andrew W.; Fischer, Debra A. et al. (2010). "The Exoplanet Orbit Database". arXiv:1012.5676 [astro-ph.SR].
  34. ^ Exoplanet Criteria for Inclusion in the Archive, NASA Exoplanet Archive
  35. ^ Basri, Gibor; Brown, Michael E. (2006). "Planetesimals To Brown Dwarfs: What is a Planet?". Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34: 193–216.  
  36. ^ Boss, Alan P.; Basri, Gibor; Kumar, Shiv S.; Liebert, James; Martín, Eduardo L.; Reipurth, Bo; Zinnecker, Hans (2003). "Nomenclature: Brown Dwarfs, Gas Giant Planets, and ?". Brown Dwarfs 211: 529.  
  37. ^ Giordano Bruno. On the Infinite Universe and Worlds (1584).
  38. ^ Newton, Isaac; I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman (1999) [1713]. The Principia: A New Translation and Guide. University of California Press. p. 940.  
  39. ^ Prognostications on Extrasolar Planets made in 1952, Title: Proposal for a project of high-precision stellar radial velocity work, Author: Otto Struve, Journal: The Observatory, Vol. 72, p. 199–200 (1952), Submission Date: 24 July 1952, Publication Date: October 1952
  40. ^ W. S. Jacob (1855). "On Certain Anomalies presented by the Binary Star 70 Ophiuchi".  
  41. ^ T. J. J. See (1896). "Researches on the Orbit of F.70 Ophiuchi, and on a Periodic Perturbation in the Motion of the System Arising from the Action of an Unseen Body".  
  42. ^ T. J. Sherrill (1999). "A Career of Controversy: The Anomaly of T. J. J. See".  
  43. ^ P. van de Kamp (1969). "Alternate dynamical analysis of Barnard's star".  
  44. ^ a b Boss, Alan (2009). The Crowded Universe: The Search for Living Planets. Basic Books. pp. 31–32.  
  45. ^ M. Bailes, A. G. Lyne, S. L. Shemar; Lyne; Shemar (1991). "A planet orbiting the neutron star PSR1829-10".  
  46. ^ A. G. Lyne, M. Bailes; Bailes (1992). "No planet orbiting PS R1829-10".  
  47. ^ Campbell, B.; Walker, G. A. H.; Yang, S. (1988). "A search for substellar companions to solar-type stars". The Astrophysical Journal 331: 902.  
  48. ^ Lawton, A. T.; Wright, P. (1989). "A planetary system for Gamma Cephei?".  
  49. ^ Walker, G. A. H; Bohlender, D. A.; Walker, A. R.; Irwin, A. W.; Yang, S. L. S.; Larson, A. (1992). "Gamma Cephei – Rotation or planetary companion?".  
  50. ^ Hatzes, A. P.; et al.; Endl, Michael; McArthur, Barbara; Paulson, Diane B.; Walker, Gordon A. H.; Campbell, Bruce; Yang, Stephenson (2003). "A Planetary Companion to Gamma Cephei A".  
  51. ^ Holtz, Robert (22 April 1994). "Scientists Uncover Evidence of New Planets Orbiting Star".  
  52. ^ M. Mayor, D. Queloz; Queloz (1995). "A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star".  
  53. ^ Jack J. Lissauer (1999). "Three Planets for Upsilon Andromedae".  
  54. ^ Doyle, L. R.; et al.; Fabrycky, D. C.; Slawson, R. W.; Howell, S. B.; Winn, J. N.; Orosz, J. A.; Prša, A; Welsh, W. F.; Quinn, S. N.; Latham, D; Torres, G; Buchhave, L. A.; Marcy, G. W.; Fortney, J. J.; Shporer, A; Ford, E. B.; Lissauer, J. J.; Ragozzine, D; Rucker, M; Batalha, N; Jenkins, J. M.; Borucki, W. J.; Koch, D; Middour, C. K.; Hall, J. R.; McCauliff, S; Fanelli, M. N.; Quintana, E. V.; Holman, M. J. (16 September 2011). "Kepler-16: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet". Science 333 (6049): 1602–6.  
  55. ^ A Family Portrait of the Alpha Centauri Star System
  56. ^ Whoa! Earth-size planet in Alpha Centauri system
  57. ^ "NASA's Exoplanet Archive KOI table". NASA. Retrieved 28 February 2014. 
  58. ^ Perryman, Michael (2011). The Exoplanet Handbook. Cambridge University Press. p. 149.  
  59. ^ Discovery of H-alpha Emission from the Close Companion Inside the Gap of Transitional Disk HD142527, L.M. Close, K.B. Follette, J.R. Males, A. Puglisi, M. Xompero, D. Apai, J. Najita, A.J. Weinberger, K. Morzinski, T.J. Rodigas, P. Hinz, V. Bailey, R. Briguglio, (Submitted on 7 Jan 2014)
  60. ^ F. Pepe, C. Lovis, D. Segransan et al. (2011). "The HARPS search for Earth-like planets in the habitable zone". Astronomy & Astrophysics 534: A58.  
  61. ^ Rodler, F.; Lopez-Morales, M.; Ribas, I. (2012). "Weighing the Non-Transiting Hot Jupiter Tau BOO b". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 753 (25): L25.  
  62. ^ Planet Hunting: Finding Earth-like Planets, www.scientificcomputing.com, Mon, 07/19/2010 - 11:58am
  63. ^ Ballard, Sarah; Fabrycky, Daniel; Fressin, Francois; Charbonneau, David; Desert, Jean-Michel; Torres, Guillermo; Marcy, Geoffrey; Burke, Christopher J. et al. (2011). "The Kepler-19 System: A Transiting 2.2 R_Earth Planet and a Second Planet Detected via Transit Timing Variations". arXiv:1109.1561 [astro-ph.EP].
  64. ^ Jack J. Lissauer, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Eric B. Ford; and others; Ford; Borucki; Fressin; Marcy; Orosz; Rowe; Torres; Welsh; Batalha; Bryson; Buchhave; Caldwell; Carter; Charbonneau; Christiansen; Cochran; Desert; Dunham; Fanelli; Fortney; Gautier Iii; Geary; Gilliland; Haas; Hall; Holman; Koch; Latham (2011). "A closely packed system of low-mass, low-density planets transiting Kepler-11". Nature 470 (7332): 53.  
  65. ^ Pál, A.; Kocsis, B. (2008). "Periastron Precession Measurements in Transiting Extrasolar Planetary Systems at the Level of General Relativity". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 389: 191–198.  
  66. ^ Silvotti, R.; et al.; Janulis, R.; Solheim, J.-E.; Bernabei, S.; Østensen, R.; Oswalt, T. D.; Bruni, I.; Gualandi, R.; Bonanno, A.; Vauclair, G.; Reed, M.; Chen, C.-W.; Leibowitz, E.; Paparo, M.; Baran, A.; Charpinet, S.; Dolez, N.; Kawaler, S.; Kurtz, D.; Moskalik, P.; Riddle, R.; Zola, S. (2007). "A giant planet orbiting the 'extreme horizontal branch' star V391 Pegasi". Nature 449 (7159): 189–91.  
  67. ^ Jenkins, J.M.; Laurance R. Doyle (2003-09-20). "Detecting reflected light from close-in giant planets using space-based photometers" (PDF). Astrophysical Journal 1 (595): 429–445.  
  68. ^ Loeb, A.; Gaudi, B. S. (2003). "Periodic Flux Variability of Stars due to the Reflex Doppler Effect Induced by Planetary Companions". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 588 (2): L117.  
  69. ^ Using the Theory of Relativity and BEER to Find Exoplanets, www.universetoday.com, by Nancy Atkinson on May 13, 2013
  70. ^ Schmid, H. M.; Beuzit, J.-L.; Feldt, M. (2006). "Search and investigation of extra-solar planets with polarimetry". Direct Imaging of Exoplanets: Science & Techniques. Proceedings of the IAU Colloquium #200 1 (C200): 165–170.  
  71. ^ Berdyugina, Svetlana V.; Andrei V. Berdyugin; Dominique M. Fluri; Vilppu Piirola (20 January 2008). "First detection of polarized scattered light from an exoplanetary atmosphere". The Astrophysical Journal 673: L83.  
  72. ^ http://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau1404/
  73. ^ http://nameexoworlds.org/
  74. ^ a b Stromberg, Joseph (10 July 2014). "We've found hundreds of new planets. And now they're going to get cool names". Vox. Retrieved 10 July 2014. 
  75. ^ a b Hessman, F. V.; Dhillon, V. S.; Winget, D. E.; Schreiber, M. R.; Horne, K.; Marsh, T. R.; Guenther, E.; Schwope, A. et al. (2010). "On the naming convention used for multiple star systems and extrasolar planets". arXiv:1012.0707 [astro-ph.SR].
  76. ^ William I. Hartkopf & Brian D. Mason. "Addressing confusion in double star nomenclature: The Washington Multiplicity Catalog". United States Naval Observatory. Retrieved 2008-09-12. 
  77. ^ Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for star 55 Cnc".  
  78. ^ Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet 16 Cyg B b".  
  79. ^ Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet HD 178911 B b".  
  80. ^ Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet HD 41004 A b".  
  81. ^ Jean Schneider (2011). "Notes for Planet Tau Boo b".  
  82. ^ WASP-94 A and B planets: hot-Jupiter cousins in a twin-star system M. Neveu-VanMalle, D. Queloz, D. R. Anderson, C. Charbonnel, A. Collier Cameron, L. Delrez, M. Gillon, C. Hellier, E. Jehin, M. Lendl, P. F. L. Maxted, F. Pepe, D. Pollacco, D. Segransan, B. Smalley, A. M. S. Smith, J. Southworth, A. H. M. J. Triaud, S. Udry, R. G. West
  83. ^ Doyle, L. R.; et al.; Fabrycky, D. C.; Slawson, R. W.; Howell, S. B.; Winn, J. N.; Orosz, J. A.; Prša, A; Welsh, W. F.; Quinn, S. N.; Latham, D; Torres, G; Buchhave, L. A.; Marcy, G. W.; Fortney, J. J.; Shporer, A; Ford, E. B.; Lissauer, J. J.; Ragozzine, D; Rucker, M; Batalha, N; Jenkins, J. M.; Borucki, W. J.; Koch, D; Middour, C. K.; Hall, J. R.; McCauliff, S; Fanelli, M. N.; Quintana, E. V.; Holman, M. J. (2011). "Kepler-16: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet". Science 333 (6049): 1602–6.  
  84. ^ Initial Conditions of Planet Formation: Lifetimes of Primordial Disks, Eric E. Mamajek, 26 Jun 2009
  85. ^ On the formation time scale and core masses of gas giant planets, W.K.M. Rice, Philip J. Armitage, 7 Oct 2003
  86. ^ A short timescale for terrestrial planet formation from Hf-W chronometry of meteorites, Yin, Qingzhu; Jacobsen, S. B.; Yamashita, K.; Blichert-Toft, J.; Télouk, P.; Albarède, F. Nature, Volume 418, Issue 6901, pp. 949–952 (2002)
  87. ^ Origin and Loss of nebula-captured hydrogen envelopes from "sub"- to "super-Earths" in the habitable zone of Sun-like stars, H. Lammer, A. Stökl, N.V. Erkaev, E.A. Dorfi, P. Odert, M. Güdel, Yu.N. Kulikov, K.G. Kislyakova, M. Leitzinger, 13 Jan 2014
  88. ^ Thermally-Driven Atmospheric Escape, R.E. Johnson, 7 Feb 2010
  89. ^ Atmospheric mass loss by stellar wind from planets around main sequence M stars, Jesus Zendejas, Antigona Segura, Alejandro Raga, 31 May 2010
  90. ^ a b c Very Low-Density Planets around Kepler-51 Revealed with Transit Timing Variations and an Anomaly Similar to a Planet-Planet Eclipse Event, Kento Masuda, (Submitted on 13 Jan 2014 (v1), last revised 14 Feb 2014 (this version, v2))
  91. ^ a b c Andrew Cumming; R. Paul Butler;  
  92. ^ Bonfils, X.; et al. (2005). "The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets: VI. A Neptune-mass planet around the nearby M dwarf Gl 581".  
  93. ^ Revealing A Universal Planet-Metallicity Correlation For Planets of Different Sizes Around Solar-Type Stars, Ji Wang, Debra A. Fischer, (Submitted on 29 Oct 2013 (v1), last revised 16 Oct 2014 (this version, v3))
  94. ^ BINARY CATALOGUE OF EXOPLANETS, Maintained by Richard Schwarz], retrieved 28 Sept 2013
  95. ^ http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multi.html
  96. ^ Odd planet, so far from its star...
  97. ^ Time Really Flies on These Kepler Planets
  98. ^ a b Saul Rappaport; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Rogers, Leslie A.; Alan Levine; Winn, Joshua N. (2013). "The Roche limit for close-orbiting planets: Minimum density, composition constraints, and application to the 4.2-hour planet KOI 1843.03". arXiv:1307.4080 [astro-ph.EP].
  99. ^ On the origin of planets at very wide orbits from the recapture of free-floating planets, Hagai B. Perets, M. B. N. Kouwenhoven, 2012
  100. ^ Scharf, Caleb; Menou, Kristen (2009). "Long-Period Exoplanets from Dynamical Relaxation". The Astrophysical Journal 693 (2): L113.  
  101. ^ D'Angelo, G.; Durisen, R. H.; Lissauer, J. J. (2011). S. Seager., ed. "Exoplanets". University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ. pp. 319–346.  
  102. ^ The Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia — Catalog Listing
  103. ^ Eric L. Nielsen and Laird M. Close (2010). "A Uniform Analysis of 118 Stars with High-Contrast Imaging: Long-Period Extrasolar Giant Planets are Rare around Sun-like Stars". Astrophysical Journal 717 (2): 878.  
  104. ^ Marcy, G.; et al. (2005). "Observed Properties of Exoplanets: Masses, Orbits and Metallicities".  
  105. ^ T. Rodigas; Hinz (2009). "Which Radial Velocity Exoplanets Have Undetected Outer Companions?". Astrophys.J. 702: 716–723.  
  106. ^ Guillem Anglada-Escudé, Mercedes López-Morales and John E. Chambers (2010). "How Eccentric Orbital Solutions Can Hide Planetary Systems in 2:1 Resonant Orbits". Astrophysical Journal 709 (1): 168.  
  107. ^ The Exoplanet Eccentricity Distribution from Kepler Planet Candidates, Stephen R. Kane, David R. Ciardi, Dawn M. Gelino, Kaspar von Braun (Submitted on 7 Mar 2012 (v1), last revised 2 Jul 2012 (this version, v2))
  108. ^ Page 2, Exoplanets: Detection, Formation, Properties, Habitability, John Mason, Springer, 2008
  109. ^ Out of Flatland: Orbits Are Askew in a Nearby Planetary System, www.scientificamerican.com, 24 May 2010.
  110. ^ "Turning planetary theory upside down". Astro.gla.ac.uk. Retrieved 2012-02-28. 
  111. ^ Tilting stars may explain backwards planets, New Scientist, 1 September 2010, Magazine issue 2776.
  112. ^ a b Length of Exoplanet Day Measured for First Time, eso.org press release, 30 April 2014
  113. ^ a b The fast spin-rotation of a young extra-solar planet, Ignas A. G. Snellen, Bernhard R. Brandl, Remco J. de Kok, Matteo Brogi, Jayne Birkby, and Henriette Schwarz, April 2014, http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7506
  114. ^ Newly Clocked Exoplanet Spins a Whole Day in 8 Hours, discovery.com Apr 30, 2014 01:00 PM ET // by Irene Klotz
  115. ^ a b Tidal Evolution of Exoplanets, Alexandre C. M. Correia, Jacques Laskar, Chapter in Exoplanets, ed. S. Seager, published by University of Arizona Press, 2010
  116. ^ Exoplanet Rotation Detected for the First Time, www.scientificamerican.com, Apr 30, 2014 |By Ron Cowen and Nature magazine
  117. ^ Doppler Imaging of Exoplanets and Brown Dwarfs, Ian J. M. Crossfield, (Submitted on 30 Apr 2014)
  118. ^ Terrestrial Planet Formation at Home and Abroad, Sean N. Raymond, Eiichiro Kokubo, Alessandro Morbidelli, Ryuji Morishima, Kevin J. Walsh, (Submitted on 5 Dec 2013 (v1), last revised 28 Jan 2014 (this version, v3))
  119. ^ a b de Wit, Julien; Seager, S. (19 December 2013). "Constraining Exoplanet Mass from Transmission Spectroscopy". Science 342 (6165): 1473–1477.  
  120. ^ Mass and Orbit Determination from Transit Timing Variations of Exoplanets, FREE ISSUE, The Astrophysical Journal Volume 688 Number 1, David Nesvorný and Alessandro Morbidelli, 2008, ApJ 688 636, doi:10.1086/592230
  121. ^ Introduction to Exoplanets, Seager and Lissauer, Chapter in Exoplanets, edited by Sara Seager, University of Arizona Press, 2010
  122. ^ Fundamental Planetary Science: Physics, Chemistry and Habitability, Jack J. Lissauer, Imke de Pater, Cambridge University Press, 16 Sep 2013, page 74
  123. ^ a b Planetesimals To Brown Dwarfs: What is a Planet?, Gibor Basri, Michael E. Brown, (Submitted on 20 Aug 2006)
  124. ^ I. Baraffe and G. Chabrier and T. Barman (2010). "The physical properties of extra-solar planets". Reports on Progress in Physics 73 (16901): 1.  
  125. ^ Characterization of the Kepler-101 planetary system with HARPS-N. A hot super-Neptune with an Earth-sized low-mass companion, A. S. Bonomo, A. Sozzetti, C. Lovis, L. Malavolta, K. Rice, L. A. Buchhave, D. Sasselov, A. C. Cameron, D. W. Latham, E. Molinari, F. Pepe, S. Udry, L. Affer, D. Charbonneau, R. Cosentino, C. D. Dressing, X. Dumusque, P. Figueira, A. F. M. Fiorenzano, S. Gettel, A. Harutyunyan, R. D. Haywood, K. Horne, M. Lopez-Morales, M. Mayor, G. Micela, F. Motalebi, V. Nascimbeni, D. F. Phillips, G. Piotto, D. Pollacco, D. Queloz, D. Ségransan, A. Szentgyorgyi, C. Watson, (Submitted on 16 Sep 2014)
  126. ^ The Mass-Radius Relation for 65 Exoplanets Smaller than 4 Earth Radii, Lauren M. Weiss, Geoffrey W. Marcy, (Submitted on 3 Dec 2013 (v1), last revised 15 Feb 2014 (this version, v4))
  127. ^ Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1–4x Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Lauren M. Weiss, Erik A. Petigura, Howard Isaacson, Andrew W. Howard, Lars A. Buchhave, (Submitted on 10 Apr 2014)
  128. ^ Lopez, E. D.; Fortney, J. J. (2013). "Understanding the Mass-Radius Relation for Sub-Neptunes: Radius as a Proxy for Composition". arXiv:1311.0329 [astro-ph.EP].
  129. ^ Three regimes of extrasolar planets inferred from host star metallicities, Lars A. Buchhave, Martin Bizzarro, David W. Latham, Dimitar Sasselov, William D. Cochran, Michael Endl, Howard Isaacson, Diana Juncher, Geoffrey W. Marcy, (Submitted on 29 May 2014)
  130. ^ Earth-mass exoplanet is no Earth twin, Nature News, Ron Cowen, 06 January 2014
  131. ^ http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2014/session/15518
  132. ^ How to Distinguish between Cloudy Mini-Neptunes and Water/Volatile-Dominated Super-Earths, Björn Benneke, Sara Seager, 26 Jun 2013
  133. ^ EXOPLANETS: FROM EXHILARATING TO EXASPERATING, 22:59, Kepler-10c: The "Mega-Earth", Dimitar Sasselov, June 2, 2014 YouTube
  134. ^ The Kepler-10 planetary system revisited by HARPS-N: A hot rocky world and a solid Neptune-mass planet, Xavier Dumusque, Aldo S. Bonomo, Raphaelle D. Haywood, Luca Malavolta, Damien Segransan, Lars A. Buchhave, Andrew Collier Cameron, David W. Latham, Emilio Molinari, Francesco Pepe, Stephane Udry, David Charbonneau, Rosario Cosentino, Courtney D. Dressing, Pedro Figueira, Aldo F. M. Fiorenzano, Sara Gettel, Avet Harutyunyan, Keith Horne, Mercedes Lopez-Morales, Christophe Lovis, Michel Mayor, Giusi Micela, Fatemeh Motalebi, Valerio Nascimbeni, David F. Phillips, Giampaolo Piotto, Don Pollacco, Didier Queloz, Ken Rice, Dimitar Sasselov, Alessandro Sozzetti, Andrew Szentgyorgyi, Chris Watson, (Submitted on 30 May 2014)
  135. ^ Super-dense remnants of gas giant exoplanets, A. Mocquet, O. Grasset and C. Sotin, EPSC Abstracts, Vol. 8, EPSC2013-986-1, 2013, European Planetary Science Congress 2013
  136. ^ Very high-density planets: a possible remnant of gas giants, A. Mocquet, O. Grasset, C. Sotin, Published 24 March 2014, doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0164 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 28 April 2014, vol. 372, no. 2014
  137. ^ a b c MASS-RADIUS RELATIONSHIPS FOR SOLID EXOPLANETS, S. Seager, M. Kuchner, C. A. Hier-Majumder, B. Militzer, February 1, 2008
  138. ^ a b c Empirical Constraints on the Oblateness of an Exoplanet, Joshua A. Carter, Joshua N. Winn, (Submitted on 8 Dec 2009 (v1), last revised 30 Dec 2009 (this version, v2))
  139. ^ Distorted, non-spherical transiting planets: impact on the transit depth and on the radius determination, Jérémy Leconte, Dong Lai, Gilles Chabrier,(Submitted on 14 Jan 2011 (v1), last revised 10 Oct 2011 (this version, v2))
  140. ^ Thermal Tides in Short Period Exoplanets, Phil Arras, Aristotle Socrates, (Submitted on 7 Jan 2009)
  141. ^ Exoplanetary Atmospheres, Nikku Madhusudhan (Cambridge), Heather Knutson (Caltech), Jonathan Fortney (UCSC), Travis Barman (U. Arizona), (Submitted on 5 Feb 2014)
  142. ^ Seager, S.; Deming, D. (2010). "Exoplanet Atmospheres". arXiv:1005.4037 [astro-ph.EP].
  143. ^ Brogi, Matteo; Snellen, Ignas A. G.; de Kok, Remco J.; Albrecht, Simon; Birkby, Jayne; de Mooij, Ernst J. W. (28 June 2012). "The signature of orbital motion from the dayside of the planet τ Boötis b". Nature 486 (7404): 502–504.  
  144. ^ Rodler, F. et al. (2012). "Weighing the Non-transiting Hot Jupiter τ Boo b". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 753 (1). L25.  
  145. ^ D. Charbonneau, T. Brown; A. Burrows; G. Laughlin (2006). "When Extrasolar Planets Transit Their Parent Stars". Protostars and Planets V.  
  146. ^ Detection of an Extrasolar Planet Atmosphere, David Charbonneau, Timothy M. Brown, Robert W. Noyes, Ronald L. Gilliland, (Submitted on 28 Nov 2001)
  147. ^ Molecular Signatures in the Near Infrared Dayside Spectrum of HD 189733b, Swain MR, Vasisht G, Tinetti G, Bouwman J, Chen P et al. 2009. ApJ. 690:L114
  148. ^ NASA - Hubble Finds First Organic Molecule on an Exoplanet, 03.19.08
  149. ^ Staff (3 December 2013). "Hubble Traces Subtle Signals of Water on Hazy Worlds".  
  150. ^ Deming, Drake; Williams, Ashlee; McCullough, Peter; Burrows, Adam; Fortney, Jonathan J.; Agol, Eric; Dobbs-Dixon, Ian; Madhusudhan, Nikku; Crouzet, Nicolas; Desert, Jean-Michel; Gilliland, Ronald L.; Haynes, Korey; Knutson, Heather A.; Line, Michael; Magic, Zazralt; Mandell, Avi M.; Ranjan, Sukrit; Charbonneau, David; Clampin, Mark; Seager, Sara; Showman, Adam P. (10 September 2013). "Infrared Transmission Spectroscopy of the Exoplanets HD 209458b and XO-1b Using the Wide Field Camera-3 on the Hubble Space Telescope".  
  151. ^ Mandell, Avi M.; Haynes, Korey; Sinukoff, Evan; Madhusudhan, Nikku; Burrows, Adam; Deming, Drake (3 December 2013). "Exoplanet Transit Spectroscopy Using WFC3: WASP-12 b, WASP-17 b, and WASP-19 b".  
  152. ^ Harrington, J.D.; Villard, Ray (24 July 2014). "RELEASE 14–197 - Hubble Finds Three Surprisingly Dry Exoplanets".  
  153. ^ Clavin, Whitney; Chou, Felicia; Weaver, Donna; Villard; Johnson, Michele (24 September 2014). "NASA Telescopes Find Clear Skies and Water Vapor on Exoplanet".  
  154. ^ Kawahara, H.; et al. (2012). "Can Ground-based Telescopes Detect the Oxygen 1.27 Micron Absorption Feature as a Biomarker in Exoplanets?". The Astrophysical Journal 758 (13): 13.  
  155. ^ Atmospheric Circulation of Terrestrial Exoplanets, Adam P. Showman, Robin D. Wordsworth, Timothy M. Merlis, Yohai Kaspi, 11 Jun 2013
  156. ^ Chu, Jennifer (October 2, 2013). "Scientists generate first map of clouds on an exoplanet".  
  157. ^ Demory, Brice-Olivier et al. (September 30, 2013). "Inference of Inhomogeneous Clouds in an Exoplanet Atmosphere".  
  158. ^ Harrington, J.D.; Weaver, Donna; Villard, Ray (December 31, 2013). "Release 13–383 - NASA's Hubble Sees Cloudy Super-Worlds With Chance for More Clouds".  
  159. ^ Moses, Julianne (January 1, 2014). "Extrasolar planets: Cloudy with a chance of dustballs".  
  160. ^ Knutson, Heather; Benecke, Björn; Deming, Drake; Homeier, Derek (January 1, 2014). "A featureless transmission spectrum for the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b".  
  161. ^ Kreidberg, Laura; Bean, Jacob L.; Desert, Jean-Michel; Benecke, Björn; Deming, Drake; Stevenson, Kevin B.; Seager, Sara; Berta-Thompson, Zachory; Seifahrt, Andreas; Homeier, Derek (January 1, 2014). "Clouds in the atmosphere of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ 1214b".  
  162. ^ New World of Iron Rain
  163. ^ On Giant Blue Alien Planet, It Rains Molten Glass, by Elizabeth Howell, SPACE.com Contributor | August 30, 2013 04:15pm ET
  164. ^ Raining Pebbles: Rocky Exoplanet Has Bizarre Atmosphere, Simulation Suggests, October 1, 2009, www.sciencedaily.com
  165. ^ 'Diamond rain' falls on Saturn and Jupiter, 14 October 2013 Last updated at 12:04, By James Morgan Science reporter, BBC News
  166. ^ Helium rain on Jupiter explains lack of neon in atmosphere, By Robert Sanders, Media Relations | March 22, 2010, newscenter.berkeley.edu
  167. ^ Abiotic oxygen-dominated atmospheres on terrestrial habitable zone planets, Robin Wordsworth, Raymond Pierrehumbert, (Submitted on 11 Mar 2014)
  168. ^ Thermal phase curves of nontransiting terrestrial exoplanets 1. Characterizing atmospheres, Franck Selsis, Robin Wordsworth, François Forget, (Submitted on 25 Apr 2011 (v1), last revised 30 May 2011 (this version, v3))
  169. ^ Atmospheric Retrieval for Super-Earths: Uniquely Constraining the Atmospheric Composition with Transmission Spectroscopy, Bjoern Benneke, Sara Seager, (Submitted on 19 Mar 2012 (v1), last revised 27 Jun 2012 (this version, v2))
  170. ^ Theoretical Spectra of Terrestrial Exoplanet Surfaces, Renyu Hu, Bethany L. Ehlmann, Sara Seager, (Submitted on 6 Apr 2012)
  171. ^ Heather Knutson, David Charbonneau, Lori Allen, et al. (2007). "A map of the day-night contrast of the extrasolar planet HD 189733b". Nature 447 (7141): 183–186.  
  172. ^ NASA Hubble Finds a True Blue Planet, July 11, 2013
  173. ^ The Deep Blue Color of HD189733b: Albedo Measurements with Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph at Visible Wavelengths, Thomas M. Evans, Frédéric Pont, David K. Sing, Suzanne Aigrain, Joanna K. Barstow, Jean-Michel Désert, Neale Gibson, Kevin Heng, Heather A. Knutson, Alain Lecavelier des Etangs, (Submitted on 11 Jul 2013)
  174. ^ "Coal-Black Alien Planet Is Darkest Ever Seen". Space.com. Retrieved 2011-08-12. 
  175. ^ Detection of visible light from the darkest world, David M. Kipping, David S. Spiegel, (Submitted on 10 Aug 2011 (v1), last revised 16 Aug 2011 (this version, v2))
  176. ^ "TrES-2b, the darkest known exoplanet, is even darker than previously thought.", Photometrically derived masses and radii of the planet and star in the TrES-2 system, Thomas Barclay, Daniel Huber, Jason F. Rowe, Jonathan J. Fortney, Caroline V. Morley, Elisa V. Quintana, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Geert Barentsen, Steven Bloemen, Jessie L. Christiansen, Brice-Olivier Demory, Benjamin J. Fulton, Jon M. Jenkins, Fergal Mullally, Darin Ragozzine, Shaun E. Seader, Avi Shporer, Peter Tenenbaum, Susan E. Thompson, (Submitted on 16 Oct 2012 (v1), last revised 19 Oct 2012 (this version, v2))
  177. ^ Footprint of a Magnetic Exoplanet, www.skyandtelescope.com, January 9, 2004, Robert Naeye
  178. ^ Magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling at Jupiter-like exoplanets with internal plasma sources: implications for detectability of auroral radio emissions, J. D. Nichols, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, published online: 31 MAR 2011, arXiv version
  179. ^ Radio Telescopes Could Help Find Exoplanets, RedOrbit – Apr 18, 2011
  180. ^ "Radio Detection of Extrasolar Planets: Present and Future Prospects" (PDF). NRL, NASA/GSFC, NRAO, Observatoìre de Paris. Retrieved 2008-10-15. 
  181. ^ Super-Earths Get Magnetic 'Shield' from Liquid Metal, Charles Q. Choi, SPACE.com, November 22, 2012 02:01pm ET,
  182. ^ Stellar Magnetic Fields as a Heating Source for Extrasolar Giant Planets, D. Buzasi, (Submitted on 6 Feb 2013)
  183. ^ Valencia, Diana; O'Connell, Richard J. (2009). "Convection scaling and subduction on Earth and super-Earths". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286 (3–4): 492.  
  184. ^ Van Heck, H.J.; Tackley, P.J. (2011). "Plate tectonics on super-Earths: Equally or more likely than on Earth". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 310 (3–4): 252.  
  185. ^ O'Neill, C.; Lenardic, A. (2007). "Geological consequences of super-sized Earths". Geophysical Research Letters 34 (19).  
  186. ^ Valencia, Diana; O'Connell, Richard J.; Sasselov, Dimitar D (November 2007). "Inevitability of Plate Tectonics on Super-Earths". Astrophysical Journal Letters 670 (1): L45–L48.  
  187. ^ Super Earths Likely To Have Both Oceans and Continents, astrobiology.com, Source: Northwestern University, Posted January 7, 2014 11:55 AM
  188. ^ Water Cycling Between Ocean and Mantle: Super-Earths Need Not be Waterworlds, Nicolas B. Cowan, Dorian S. Abbo, (Submitted on 3 Jan 2014
  189. ^ Scientists Discover a Saturn-like Ring System Eclipsing a Sun-like Star, Space Daily, Jan 13, 2012
  190. ^ Planetary Construction Zones in Occultation: Discovery of an Extrasolar Ring System Transiting a Young Sun-like Star and Future Prospects for Detecting Eclipses by Circumsecondary and Circumplanetary Disks, Eric E. Mamajek, Alice C. Quillen, Mark J. Pecaut, Fred Moolekamp, Erin L. Scott, Matthew A. Kenworthy, Andrew Collier Cameron, Neil R. Parley, (Submitted on 19 Aug 2011 (v1), last revised 10 Jan 2012 (this version, v2))
  191. ^  
  192. ^ Warm Saturns: On the Nature of Rings around Extrasolar Planets that Reside Inside the Ice Line, Hilke E. Schlichting (UCLA), Philip Chang (CITA), (Submitted on 19 Apr 2011)
  193. ^ A sub-Earth-mass moon orbiting a gas giant or a high-velocity planetary system in the galactic bulge
  194. ^ exoplanet stirs up dust, Phys.org, Aug 28, 2012
  195. ^ New-found exoplanet is evaporating away, Posted May 18, 2012 - 10:55 by Emma Woollacott
  196. ^ Alien Life More Likely on 'Dune' Planets, 09/01/11, Charles Q. Choi, Astrobiology Magazine
  197. ^ Habitable Zone Limits for Dry Planets, Yutaka Abe, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, Norman H. Sleep, and Kevin J. Zahnle. Astrobiology. June 2011, 11(5): 443–460. doi:10.1089/ast.2010.0545
  198. ^ Exoplanet Habitability, DOI: 10.1126/science.1232226 Exoplanet Habitability, Science 340, 577 (2013); Sara Seager
  199. ^ Emergence of two types of terrestrial planet on solidification of magma ocean, Keiko Hamano, Yutaka Abe, Hidenori Genda, 2013, Nature
  200. ^ Strong Dependence of the Inner Edge of the Habitable Zone on Planetary Rotation Rate, Jun Yang, Gwenael Boue, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Dorian S. Abbot, 19 Apr 2014
  201. ^ Amend, J. P., & Teske, A. (2005). Expanding frontiers in deep subsurface microbiology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 219(1–2), 131–155. Elsevier.
  202. ^ Further away planets 'can support life' say researchers, BBC, 7 January 2014 Last updated at 12:40
  203. ^ The Steppenwolf: A proposal for a habitable planet in interstellar space, Dorian S. Abbot, Eric R. Switzer, (Submitted on 5 Feb 2011 (v1), last revised 2 Jun 2011 (this version, v2))
  204. ^ The Habitable Epoch of the Early Universe, Abraham Loeb (Harvard), (submitted on 2 Dec 2013)
  205. ^ Habitability of Earth-like planets with high obliquity and eccentric orbits: results from a general circulation model, Manuel Linsenmeier, Salvatore Pascale, Valerio Lucarini, 21 Jan 2014
  206. ^ April 15, 2014, Astronomers: ‘Tilt-a-worlds’ could harbor life, Peter Kelley, www.washington.edu
  207. ^ Effects of Extreme Obliquity Variations on the Habitability of Exoplanets, J. C. Armstrong, R. Barnes, S. Domagal-Goldman, J. Breiner, T. R. Quinn, V. S. Meadows 14 Apr 2014
  208. ^ July 18, 2013, A warmer planetary haven around cool stars, as ice warms rather than cools, Peter Kelley, www.washington.edu
  209. ^ Spectrum-driven Planetary Deglaciation Due to Increases in Stellar Luminosity, Aomawa L. Shields, Cecilia M. Bitz, Victoria S. Meadows, Manoj M. Joshi, Tyler D. Robinson, 14 Mar 2014
  210. ^ Tidal Venuses: Triggering a Climate Catastrophe via Tidal Heating, Rory Barnes, Kristina Mullins, Colin Goldblatt, Victoria S. Meadows, James F. Kasting, Rene Heller, (Submitted on 22 Mar 2012 (v1), last revised 27 Nov 2012 (this version, v2))
  211. ^ Superhabitable Worlds, René Heller (1), John Armstrong (2) ((1) McMaster University, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Hamilton (ON), Canada, (2) Weber State University, Dept. of Physics, Ogden (UT), USA), (Submitted on 10 Jan 2014)
  212. ^ Tidal Heating of Terrestrial Extra-Solar Planets and Implications for their Habitability, Brian Jackson, Rory Barnes, Richard Greenberg, (Submitted on 20 Aug 2008)
  213. ^ [NULL] (5 December 2011). "Kepler-22b, our first planet in the habitable zone of a Sun-like Star". Kepler.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2012-02-28. 
  214. ^ Staff (20 September 2012). "LHS 188 – High proper-motion Star".  
  215. ^ a b Méndez, Abel (29 August 2012). "A Hot Potential Habitable Exoplanet around Gliese 163".  
  216. ^ a b Redd, Nola Taylor (20 September 2012). "Newfound Alien Planet a Top Contender to Host Life".  
  217. ^ a b Borucki, W. J.; et al. (2013). "Kepler-62: A Five-Planet System with Planets of 1.4 and 1.6 Earth Radii in the Habitable Zone".  
  218. ^ Johnson, Michele; Harrington, J.D. (18 April 2013). "NASA's Kepler Discovers Its Smallest 'Habitable Zone' Planets to Date".  
  219. ^ Kaltenegger, L.; Sasselov, D; Rugheimer, S. (2013). "Water Planets in the Habitable Zone: Atmospheric Chemistry, Observable Features, and the case of Kepler-62e and -62f". arXiv:1304.5058 [astro-ph.EP].
  220. ^ Howell, Elizabeth (6 February 2013). "Closest 'Alien Earth' May Be 13 Light-Years Away". Space.com. TechMediaNetwork. Retrieved 7 February 2013. 
  221. ^ Kopparapu, Ravi kumar (March 2013). "A revised estimate of the occurrence rate of terrestrial planets in the habitable zones around kepler m-dwarfs".  
  222. ^ Staff (May 3, 2013). "Special Issue: Exoplanets".  

Further reading

  • Dorminey, Bruce (2001) Distant Wanderers Springer-Verlag ISBN 978-0-387-95074-7 (Hardback) ISBN 978-1-4419-2872-6 (Paperback)
  • Villard, Ray & Cook, Lynette R (2005) Infinite Worlds: An Illustrated Voyage to Planets Beyond Our Sun University of California Press ISBN 978-0-520-23710-0
  • Boss, Alan (2009) The Crowded Universe: The Search for Living Planets Basic Books ISBN 978-0-465-00936-7 (Hardback) ISBN 978-0-465-02039-3 (Paperback)
  • Seager, Sara (2010) Exoplanet Atmospheres: Physical Processes Princeton University Press ISBN 978-0-691-11914-4 (Hardback) ISBN 978-0-691-14645-4 (Paperback)
  • Seager, Sara (Editor) (2011) Exoplanets University of Arizona Press ISBN 978-0-8165-2945-2
  • Perryman, Michael (2011) The Exoplanet Handbook Cambridge University Press ISBN 978-0-521-76559-6
  • Yaqoob, Tahir (2011) "Exoplanets and Alien Solar Systems" New Earth Labs (Education and Outreach) ISBN 978-0-974-16892-0 (Paperback)

Climate and weather

  • Patterns of Sunlight on Extra-Solar Planets, Tony Dobrovolskis, March 18, 2014
  • Possible climates on terrestrial exoplanets, Francois Forget, Jeremy Leconte, 18 Nov 2013
  • Indication of insensitivity of planetary weathering behavior and habitable zone to surface land fraction, Dorian S. Abbot, Nicolas B. Cowan, Fred J. Ciesla, 8 Aug 2012
  • Clouds and Hazes in Exoplanet Atmospheres, Mark S. Marley, Andrew S. Ackerman, Jeffrey N. Cuzzi, Daniel Kitzmann, 23 Jan 2013


After hydrogen and helium, oxygen is the most common element in many planetary systems (in some systems carbon is more common than oxygen), and water H2O one of the most common compounds. Gas giants are composed mostly of hydrogen and helium, but most planets are between the size of Earth and Neptune, where many planets will have deep water oceans covering the entire surface in addition to a H–He envelope.

  • Water: from clouds to planets, Ewine F. van Dishoeck, Edwin A. Bergin, Dariusz C. Lis, Jonathan I. Lunine, 25 Feb 2014
  • Are Exoplanets Orbiting Red Dwarf Stars too Dry for Life?, Michael Schirber, Astrobiology Magazine, August 27, 2013
  • Carbon-Rich Exoplanets May Lack Surface Water, October 26, 2013
  • 'Water-Trapped' Worlds, Adam Hadhazy, Astrobiology Magazine, 07/18/13
  • Lobster-Shaped Extrasolar Oceans, 03/10/14, Charles Q. Choi, Astrobiology Magazine
  • Alien Moons Could Bake Dry from Young Gas Giants' Hot Glow, Adam Hadhazy, Astrobiology Magazine March 25, 2014
  • The Longevity of Oceans on Terrestrial Exoplanets, Bullock, Mark Alan; Grinspoon, D. H.
  • False Positive For Ocean Glint on Exoplanets: the Latitude-Albedo Effect, Nicolas B. Cowan, Dorian S. Abbot, Aiko Voigt, 4 May 2012

Orbital dynamics

Eccentricity dynamics

  • High Orbital Eccentricities of Extrasolar Planets Induced by the Kozai Mechanism, G. Takeda, F.A. Rasio, last revised 9 Jun 2005
  • Extreme Climate Variations from Milankovitch-like Eccentricity Oscillations in Extrasolar Planetary Systems, David S. Spiegel, 11 Oct 2010
  • Orbital Dynamics of Multi-Planet Systems with Eccentricity Diversity, Stephen R. Kane, Sean N. Raymond, 8 Feb 2014
  • Type II migration of planets on eccentric orbits, Althea V. Moorhead, Eric B. Ford, 21 Apr 2009
  • Evolution of Giant Planets in Eccentric Disks, Gennaro D'Angelo, Stephen H. Lubow, Matthew R. Bate, 1 Dec 2006

Inclination dynamics

  • A Class of Warm Jupiters with Mutually Inclined, Apsidally Misaligned, Close Friends, Rebekah Dawson, Eugene Chiang, 9 Oct 2014

Periastron precession

The general relativistic precession rate of periastra in close-in exoplanets can be orders of magnitude larger than the magnitude of the same effect for Mercury. The realization that some of the close-in exoplanets have significant eccentricities raises the possibility that this precession might be detectable. We find that precession of the periastra of the magnitude expected from general relativity can be detectable in timescales of roughly 10 years or less. The contribution of tidal deformation to the precession may dominate the total precession in cases where the relativistic precession is detectable.[1]

  • Cyclic Transit Probabilities of Long-Period Eccentric Planets Due to Periastron Precession, Stephen R. Kane, Jonathan Horner, Kaspar von Braun, 7 Sep 2012

Nodal precession

WASP-33 is a fast-rotating star that hosts a hot Jupiter moving along an almost polar orbit with a semi-major axis of 0.02 AU. The quadrupole mass moment (J_2) and the proper angular momentum (S) of the star are 1900 and 400 times, respectively, larger than those of the Sun. This means that significant classical and relativistic non-Keplerian orbital effects should take place in such a system. In particular the fast rotation causes large nodal precession because of the star's oblateness and the Lense–Thirring effect.[2]

Periastron precession is rotation of a planet's orbit within a plane whereas nodal precession is rotation of the plane itself. Nodal precession is more easily seen as distinct from periastron precession when the orbital plane is inclined to the star's rotation, the extreme case being a polar orbit as with WASP-33.

External links

  • The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia (Paris Observatory)
  • NASA Exoplanet Archive
  • Open Exoplanet Catalogue
  • The Habitable Exoplanets Catalog (PHL/UPR Arecibo)
  • The Habitable Zone Gallery
  • Exoplanet Orbit Data Explorer interactive table and plotter for exploring data from Exoplanet Orbit Database
  • Exoplanets: Interactive Visual of XKCD 1071
  • Exoplanet database for iPhone/iPod/iPad with visualizations
  • NASA's PlanetQuest
  • A Zoo of Extra-Solar Planets (audio and transcript)  — Astronomy Cast on 9 February 2009 with Pamela Gay and Chris Lintott
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curves Using Differential Photometry
  • Extrasolar Planets – D. Montes, UCM
  • Exoplanets at Paris Observatory
  • "Exoplanets in relation to host star's current habitable zone". planetarybiology.com. 
  • Doyle, Laurence R. (19 March 2009). "Naming New Extrasolar Planets". SETI institute. SPACE.com. Retrieved 2010-06-02. 
  • ETD – Exoplanet Transit Database (Exoplanet Transit Database)
  • Exomol Project Spectroscopic database of molecules of importance for the characterization of exoplanets.
  • Characterizing bulk composition of Solid Planets
  • Graphical Comparison of Extrasolar Planets
  • Video (86:49) - "Search for Life in the Universe" - NASA (July 14, 2014).


  • Arxiv: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
  • Extrasolar News and Discoveries
  • astrobites the astro-ph reader's digest
  • Virtual Planetary Laboratory