Bryophyte is a traditional name used to refer to all embryophytes (land plants) that do not have true vascular tissue and are therefore called "non-vascular plants". Some bryophytes do have specialized tissues for the transport of water; however, since these do not contain lignin, they are not considered to be true vascular tissue. As of 2014, it is uncertain whether bryophytes are a natural or monophyletic group or a paraphyletic group, but the name is convenient and remains in use as a collective term for mosses, hornworts, and liverworts. Bryophytes produce enclosed reproductive structures (gametangia and sporangia), but they produce neither flowers nor seeds, reproducing via spores. The term "bryophyte" comes from Greek βρύον, bryon, "tree-moss, oyster-green" + φυτόν – phyton "plant".
Life cycle 1
- Sexuality 1.1
Classification and phylogeny 2
- Paraphyletic view 2.1
- Other views 2.2
- Evolution 2.3
- Comparison 3
- See also 4
- References 5
- Bibliography 6
- External links 7
Like all land plants (embryophytes), bryophytes have life cycles with alternation of generations. A haploid gametophyte, each of whose cells contains a fixed number of unpaired chromosomes, gives rise to a diploid sporophyte, each of whose cells contains twice the number of paired chromosomes. Gametophytes produce haploid sperm and eggs which fuse to form diploid zygotes that grow into sporophytes. Sporophytes produce haploid spores by meiosis, that grow into gametophytes.
Bryophytes are gametophyte dominant, meaning that the more prominent, longer-lived plant is the haploid gametophyte. The diploid sporophytes appear only occasionally and remain attached to and nutritionally dependent on the gametophyte. In bryophytes, the sporophytes are always unbranched and produce a single sporangium (spore producing capsule).
Liverworts, mosses and hornworts spend most of their lives as gametophytes. archegonia and antheridia, are produced on the gametophytes, sometimes at the tips of shoots, in the axils of leaves or hidden under thalli. Some bryophytes create elaborate structures that bear gametangia called gametangiophores. Sperm are flagellated and must swim from antheridia to archegonia. Arthropods may assist in transfer of sperm. Fertilized eggs become zygotes, which develop into sporophyte embryos inside the archegonia. Mature sporophytes do not branch and remain attached to the gametophyte. They consist of a stalk called a seta and a single sporangium or capsule. Inside the sporangium, haploid spores are produced by meiosis. These are dispersed, most commonly by wind, and if they land in a suitable environment can develop into a new gametophyte. Thus bryophytes disperse by a combination of swimming sperm and spores, in a manner similar to lycophytes, ferns and other cryptogams.
The arrangement of antheridia and archegonia on an individual bryophyte plant is usually constant within a species, although in some species it may depend on environmental conditions. The main division is between species in which the antheridia and archegonia occur on the same plant and those in which they occur on different plants. The term monoicous may be used where antheridia and archegonia occur on the same gametophyte and the term dioicous where they occur on different gametophytes. In seed plants, "monoecious" is used where flowers with stamens (microsporangia) and flowers with pistils (megasporangia) occur on the same sporophyte and "dioecious" where they occur on different sporophytes. These terms occasionally may be used instead of "monoicous" and "dioicous" to describe bryophyte gametophytes. "Monoecious" and "monoicous" are both derived from the Greek for "one house", "dioecious" and "dioicous" from the Greek for two houses. The use of the "oicy" terminology is said to have the advantage of emphasizing the difference between bryophyte and seed plant sexuality.
Monoicous plants are necessarily bisexual (or hermaphroditic), meaning that the same plant has both sexes. The exact arrangement of the antheridia and archegonia in monoicous plants varies. They may be borne on different shoots (autoicous or autoecious), on the same shoot but not together in a common structure (paroicous or paroecious), or together in a common "inflorescence" (synoicous or synoecious). Dioicous plants are unisexual, meaning that the same plant has only one sex. All four patterns (autoicous, paroicous, synoicous and dioicous) occur in species of the moss genus Bryum.
Classification and phylogeny
Traditionally, all living land plants without vascular tissues were classified in a single taxonomic group, often a division (or phylum). More recently, phylogenetic research has questioned whether the bryophytes form a monophyletic group and thus whether they should form a single taxon. Although a 2005 study supported the traditional view that the bryophytes form a monophyletic group, by 2010 a broad consensus had emerged among systematists that bryophytes as a whole are not a natural group (i.e., are paraphyletic), although each of the three extant (living) groups is monophyletic. The three lineages are Marchantiophyta (liverworts), Bryophyta (mosses) and Anthocerotophyta (hornworts). The vascular plants or tracheophytes are the fourth lineage of living land plants. In this analysis, hornworts are sister to vascular plants and liverworts are sister to all other land plants. However, phylogenetic studies continue to produce different results; in particular those based on gene sequences suggest the bryophytes are paraphyletic, whereas those based on the amino acid translations of the same genes suggest they are monophyletic. A 2014 study concluded that composition biases were responsible for the conflicting results and that the bryophytes are monophyletic. The issue remains unresolved.
When extinct plants are taken into account, the picture is slightly altered. Some extinct land plants, such as the sporangium). In all other land plants, the polysporangiophytes, the sporophyte is branched and carries many sporangia. It has been argued that this contrast between bryophytes and other land plants is less misleading than the traditional one of non-vascular versus vascular plant, since many mosses have well-developed water-conducting vessels. The contrast is shown in a slightly different cladogram:
The term "bryophyte" thus refers to a grade of lineages defined primarily by what they lack: compared to other living land plants, they lack vascular tissue containing lignin; compared to all other land plants, they lack branched sporophytes bearing multiple sporangia. The prominence of the gametophyte in the life cycle is also a shared feature of the three bryophyte lineages (extant vascular plants are all sporophyte dominant).
An alternative phylogeny, based on amino acids rather than genes, shows bryophytes as a monophyletic group:
If this phylogeny proves correct, then the complex sporophyte of living vascular plants might have evolved independently of the simpler unbranched sporophyte present in bryophytes. Other studies suggest a monophyletic group comprising liverworts and mosses, with hornworts being sister to vascular plants.
Bryophytes are the oldest of all lineages of land plants and are believed to be a vital link in the migration of plants from aquatic environments onto land. A number of physical features link bryophytes to both land plants and aquatic plants. Two distinct adaptations have helped to make the move from water to land possible and forged the way for plants to colonize the Earth's terrestrial environments. A waxy cuticle covering the soft tissue of the plant provides protection and prevents desiccation of the plant's tissues; and the development of gametangia provided further protection specifically for gametes. They also have embryonic development which is a significant adaptation seen in land plants and not green algae. Connections to their aquatic ancestry are also evident through their dependence on water for reproduction and survival. A thin layer of water is required on the surface of the plant to enable the movement of sperm between gametophytes and the fertilization of an egg.
Summary of the differential characteristics of the gametophytes of the three groups of bryophytes:
|Structure||Thalloid or Foliose||Foliose||Thalloid|
|Symmetry||Dorsiventral or radial||Radial||Dorsiventral|
Summary of the differential characteristics of the sporophytes of the three groups of bryophytes:
|Structure||Small, without chlorophyll||Large, with chlorophyll||Large, with chlorophyll|
|Maturation of spores||Simultaneous||Simultaneous||Graduate|
|Dispersion of spores||Elaters||Peristome teeth||Pseudo-elaters|
|Dehiscence||Longitudinal or irregular||Transverse||Longitudinal|
- Marchantiophyta (liverworts)
- Anthocerotophyta (hornworts)
- Bryophyta (mosses)
- Plant sexuality
- "Reviews glossary". Retrieved 2009-03-26.
- "What are Bryophytes". Retrieved 2009-05-31.
- "Bryophytes - introduction". Retrieved 2009-05-31.
- Cronberg N, Natcheva R, Hedlund K (2006). "Microarthropods Mediate Sperm Transfer in Mosses". Science 313 (5791): 1255.
- Glime, J.M. & Bisang, I. (2014). "Sexuality: Its Determination (Ch. 3-1)" (PDF). In Glime, J.M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1 Physiological Ecology. Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Retrieved 2014-11-09.
- Watson, E.V. (1981). British Mosses and Liverworts (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 7. (Watson uses the "oecy" terms rather than the "oicy" terms.)
- Goremykin, V. V. & Hellwig, F. H. (2005). "Evidence for the most basal split in land plants dividing bryophyte and tracheophyte lineages". Plant Systematics and Evolution 254 (1–2): 93–103.
- Konrat, M., Shaw, A. J., Renzaglia, K. S. (2010). "A special issue of Phytotaxa dedicated to Bryophytes: The closest living relatives of early land plants". Phytotaxa 9: 5–10.
- Troitsky AV, Ignatov MS, Bobrova VK, Milyutina IA (December 2007). "Contribution of genosystematics to current concepts of phylogeny and classification of bryophytes". Biochemistry Mosc. 72 (12): 1368–76.
- Knoop, Volker (2010). "Looking for sense in the nonsense: a short review of non-coding organellar DNA elucidating the phylogeny of bryophytes". Tropical Bryology 31: 51–60.
- "GLOSSARY B". Retrieved 2009-03-26.
- Qiu, Y. L., Li, L., Wang, B.; et al. (October 2006). "The deepest divergences in land plants inferred from phylogenomic evidence". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (42): 15511–6.
- Cox, Cymon J.; Li, Blaise; Foster, Peter G.; Embley, T. Martin & Civáň, Peter (2014). "Conflicting Phylogenies for Early Land Plants are Caused by Composition Biases among Synonymous Substitutions". Systematic Biology 63 (2): 272–279.
- Kenrick, Paul & Crane, Peter R. (1997a). "The Origin and Early Diversification of Land Plants: A Cladistic Study". Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
- Kenrick, P. & Crane, P.R. (1997b). "The origin and early evolution of plants on land". Nature 389 (6646): 33–39.
- Bell, N. E. & Hyvönen, J. (2010). "Phylogeny of the moss class Polytrichopsida (BRYOPHYTA): Generic-level structure and incongruent gene trees". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2): 381–398.
- Crane, P. R.; Herendeen, P. & Friis, E. M. (2004). "Fossils and plant phylogeny". American Journal of Botany 91 (10): 1683–99.
- Cox et al. 2014, p. 274.
- Karol, Kenneth G.; Arumuganathan, Kathiravetpillai; Boore, Jeffrey L.; Duffy, Aaron M.; Everett, Karin DE; Hall, John D.; Hansen, S.K.; Kuehl, Jennifer V.; Mandoli, Dina F.; Mishler, Brent D.; Olmstead, Richard G.; Renzaglia, Karen S. & Wolf, Paul G. (2010). "Complete plastome sequences of Equisetum arvense and Isoetes flaccida: implications for phylogeny and plastid genome evolution of early land plant lineages". BMC Evolutionary Biology 10 (1): 321.
- Purcell, Adam. "Bryophytes". Basic Biology.
- Lesica, P., McCune, B., Cooper, S. V., Hong, W. S. (1991), Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 1745–1755
- Andrew's Moss Site Photos of bryophytes
- 27-May-2013 Centuries-old frozen plants revived, 400-year-old bryophyte specimens left behind by retreating glaciers in Canada are brought back to life in the laboratory.