Corruption in India
|Corruption by country|
|Oceania and the Pacific|
Corruption in India is a major issue that adversely affects its economy. A study conducted by Transparency International in year 2005 found that more than 62% of Indians had firsthand experience of paying bribes or influence peddling to get jobs done in public offices successfully. In its study conducted in year 2008, Transparency International reports about 40% of Indians had firsthand experience of paying bribes or using a contact to get a job done in public office.
In 2014 India ranked 85th out of 175 countries in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, compared to its neighbors Bhutan (30th), Bangladesh (145th), Myanmar (156th), China (100th), Nepal (126th), Pakistan (126th) and Sri Lanka (85th). In 2013, India was ranked 94th out of 175 countries.
Most of the largest sources of corruption in India are entitlement programmes and social spending schemes enacted by the Indian government. Examples include Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act and National Rural Health Mission. Other daily sources of corruption include India's trucking industry which is forced to pay billions in bribes annually to numerous regulatory and police stops on its interstate highways.
Indian media has widely published allegations of corrupt Indian citizens stashing trillions of dollars in Swiss banks. Swiss authorities, however, deny these allegations.
The causes of corruption in India include excessive regulations, complicated taxes and licensing systems, numerous government departments each with opaque bureaucracy and discretionary powers, monopoly by government controlled institutions on certain goods and services delivery, and the lack of transparent laws and processes. There are significant variations in level of corruption as well as in state government efforts to reduce corruption across India.
- Politics 1
- Land and property 2.1
- Tendering processes and awarding contracts 2.2
- Medicine 2.3
- Science and technology 2.4
- Income tax department 2.5
- Preferential award of mineral resources 2.6
- Driver Licensing 2.7
- Trends 2.8
Black money 3
- Black Money in Switzerland 3.1
- Business and Corruption 4
- Judiciary 5
- Armed forces 6
Anti-corruption efforts 7
- Right to Information Act 7.1
- Right to public services legislation 7.2
- Anti-corruption laws in India 7.3
- Anti-corruption police and courts 7.4
- Civic anti-corruption organisations 7.5
- Factors contributing to corruption in India 8
Impact of corruption 9
- Loss of credibility 9.1
- Economic loss 9.2
- Lower corruption, higher growth rates 9.3
- See also 10
- References 11
- Further reading 12
- External links 13
As of December 2008, 120 of India's 523 parliament members were accused of crimes, under India's First Information Report procedure wherein anyone can allege another of committing a crime. Many of the biggest scandals since 2010 have involved very high level government officials, including Cabinet Ministers and Chief Ministers, such as in the 2G spectrum scam ( ₹1.76 lakh crore), the 2010 Commonwealth Games scam ( ₹70 thousand crore), the Adarsh Housing Society scam, the Coal Mining Scam (₹1.86 lakh crore), the Mining Scandal in Karnataka and the Cash for Vote scam.
A 2005 study done by Transparency International in India found that more than 62% of the people had firsthand experience of paying bribe or peddling influence to get a job done in a public office. Taxes and bribes are common between state borders; Transparency International estimates that truckers pay annually 222 billion (US$ 4.5 billion) in bribes.
Government regulators and police share in bribe money, each to the tune of 43% and 45% respectively. The en route stoppages including those at checkpoints and entry-points take up to 11 hours in a day. About 60% of these (forced) stoppages on road by concerned authorities such as government regulators, police, forest, sales and excise, octroi, weighing and measuring department are for extorting money. The loss in productivity due to these stoppages is an important national concern. The number of truck trips could increase by 40%, if forced delays are avoided. According to a 2007 World Bank published report, the travel time for a Delhi-Mumbai trip can be reduced by about 2 days per trip if the corruption and associated regulatory stoppages to extract bribes was eliminated.
A 2009 survey of the leading economies of Asia, revealed Indian bureaucracy to be not only the least efficient out of Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand, South Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan, Vietnam, China, Philippines and Indonesia, but also that working with India's civil servants was a "slow and painful" process.
Land and property
Officials are alleged to steal state property. In cities and villages throughout India, consisting of municipal and other government officials, elected politicians, judicial officers, real estate developers and law enforcement officials, acquire, develop and sell land in illegal ways.
Tendering processes and awarding contracts
A 2006 report claimed state-funded construction activities in Uttar Pradesh, such as road building, were dominated by construction mafias, which are groupings of corrupt public works officials, materials suppliers, politicians and construction contractors.
Corruption caused problems in government funded projects are not limited to the state of Uttar Pradesh. According to The World Bank, aid programmes are beset by corruption, bad administration and under-payments. As an example, the report cites only 40% of grain handed out for the poor reaches its intended target. The World Bank study finds that the public distribution programmes and social spending contracts have proven to be a waste due to corruption.
As an example, the government implemented the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) on 25 August 2005. The Central government outlay for this welfare scheme is 400 billion (US$6.5 billion) in FY 2010–2011. After 5 years of implementation, in 2011, the programme was widely criticised as no more effective than other poverty reduction programmes in India. Despite its best intentions, MGNREGA faces the challenges of corrupt officials reportedly pocketing money on behalf of fake rural employees, poor quality of the programme's infrastructure, and unintended destructive effect on poverty.
In Government Hospitals, corruption is associated with non-availability/duplication of medicines, getting admission, consultations with doctors and availing diagnostic services.
National Rural Health Mission is another health care-related government programme that has been subject to large scale corruption allegations. This social spending and entitlement programme hoped to improve health care delivery across rural India. The programme has been managed since 2005 by the Ministry of Health of the Indian government. The Indian government mandated a spending of INR 277 billion in 2004–05, and increased it annually to be about 1% of India's gross domestic product. The National Rural Health Mission programme has been clouded by a large-scale corruption scandal in which top government appointed officials were arrested, several of whom died under mysterious circumstances including one in prison. Corruption, waste and fraud-related losses from this government programme has been alleged to be 100 billion (US$2 billion).
Science and technology
- CIC – The Central Information Commission is charged with interpreting the Right to Information Act, 2005.
- DoPT – The Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions, is charged with being the nodal agency for the Right to Information Act, 2005. It has the powers to make rules regarding appeals, fees, etc.
- 2013 Ernst and Young Report on Bribery & Corruption
- Arun Shourie on solutions to fight corruption in India  And corruption in india
Kaur, Ravinder. "India Inc. and its Moral Discontents". Economic and Political Weekly.
- Khatri, Naresh. 2013. Anatomy of Indian Brand of Crony Capitalism. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2335201
- Kohli, Suresh (1975). Corruption in India: The Growing Evil. India: Chetana Pvt.Ltd.
- Dwivedy, Surendranath; Bhargava, G. S. (1967). "Political Corruption in India".
- Gupta, K. N. (2001). Corruption in India. Anmol Publications Pvt Ltd. .
- Halayya, M. (1985). "Corruption in India". Affiliated East-West Press.
- Guhan, Sanjivi; Paul, Samuel (1997). "Corruption in India: Agenda for Action". Vision Books.
- Vittal, N. (2003). Corruption in India: The Roadblock to National Prosperity. Academic Foundation.
- Somiah, C.G. (2010). The honest always stand alone. New Delhi: Niyogi Books.
- Nirvikar Singh (19 December 2010). "The trillion-dollar question". The Financial Express.
- "Transparency International – the global coalition against corruption". Transparency.org. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
- "India Corruption Study 2005: To Improve Governance: Volume I – Key Highlights New Delhi". Transparency International India. 30 June 2005. pp. 1–3.
- "India Corruption Study – 2008". Transparency International. 2008.
- CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2014: RESULTS
- India ranks 85th in global corruption index; Denmark retains top spot
- "India to give free medicine to millions". The Financial Times. 5 July 2012.
- "Indian rural welfare – Digging holes". The Economist. 5 November 2011.
- "Cops turn robbers on India's roads". Asia Online. 27 August 2009.
- "White Paper on Black Money". Ministry of Finance, Government of India. 2012.
- "Banking secrecy spices up Indian elections". SWISSINFO – A member of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation. 14 May 2009.
- "Survey on Bribery and Corruption – Impact on Economy and Business Environment". KPMG. 2011.
- Debroy and Bhandari (2011). "Corruption in India". The World Finance Review.
- "A special report on India: The democracy tax is rising: Indian politics is becoming ever more labyrinthine". The Economist. 11 December 2008.
- MDRA (February 2007). "Corruption in Trucking Operations in India". The World Bank.
- "How much do the corrupt earn?". The Economic Times. 11 September 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
- "UP trucker won’t give bribe, pays with his life". Indian Express. 27 September 2011.
- Indian bureaucracy ranked worst in Asia: Survey The Times of India, 3 June 2009.
- K.R. Gupta and J.R. Gupta, Indian Economy, Vol #2, Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, 2008, ISBN 81-269-0926-9. Snippet: ... the land market already stands subverted and an active land mafia has already been created ...
- "Mulayam Hits Mafia Hard". India Today. 16 October 2006. Retrieved 30 October 2008. Snippet: ... The road sector has always been the main source of income for the mafia. They either ask their men directly to grab the contracts or allow an outsider to take the contract after accepting a hefty commission
- "India aid programme 'beset by corruption' – World Bank". BBC News. 18 May 2011.
- Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Govt of India
- Tom Wright and Harsh Gupta (29 April 2011). "India's Boom Bypasses Rural Poor". The Wall Street Journal.
- "Health scam: Former CMO, Sachan booked". Hindustan Times. 4 August 2011. Retrieved 13 August 2012.
- "The New Indian Express". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 13 August 2012.
- "NRHM scam: 6 officials booked in accountant's murder – India – DNA". Dnaindia.com. 17 February 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2012.
- Reddy, Prashant (20 May 2012). "CSIR Tech. Pvt. Ltd: Its controversial past and its uncertain future". SpicyIP.com. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
- "Indian Scientists Claim Lab Corruption". ScienceNOW. 23 January 1998.
- Singh, Mahendra Pratap (13 February 2010). "GROUND REPORT INDIA: Without prejudice, fingers point to Rs. 50.00 Lakhs financial embezzlement by Dr. R. Tuli, Director".
- Jayaraman, K.S. (9 November 2009). "Report row ousts top Indian scientist". Nature. Retrieved 19 June 2012.
- Ayyadurai, VA Shiva; Sardana, Deepak (19 October 2009). "CSIR-TECH Path Forward". Retrieved 15 April 2013.
- Ayyadurai, VA Shiva (16 December 2012). "VA Shiva’s Lecture at Indian Science Congress Centenary".
- Bhaduri, Sumit (8 January 2013). "Indian science must break free from the present bureaucratic culture to come up with big innovative ideas". Times of India.
- Jayaraman, K.S. (6 January 2012). "Indian science in need of overhaul". Nature.
- "Corruption in Income-Tax: beaten by Babudom". LiveMint.
- "Two Income Tax officials booked for corruption". The Indian Express. India.
- "Dredging out mineral piracy, 7 September 2011". The Hindu, Business Line.
- "Full Report of Karnataka Lokayukta on Illegal Mining of Iron Ore, 27 July 2011". Chennai, India: The Hindu, Business Line.
- Bertrand, Marianne et al. Obtaining a Driver's License in India: An Experimental Approach to Studying Corruption, The Quarterly Journal of Economics (Nov 2007, No. 122,4)
- Corruption in Driver licensing Process in Delhi http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/mullainathan/files/Corruption.in.Driving.Licensing.Process.in.Delhi.pdf
- 2013 EY study
- Roy and Narayan (2011). "India Corruption Study 2010". CMS Transparency.
- David Loyn (1 March 2012). "British aid to India: Helping Bihar's poor". BBC News.
- Kar, Dev (2010). The Drivers and Dynamics of Illicit Financial Flows from India: 1948–2008. Washington, DC: Global Financial Integrity.
- "The Hindu Business Line : Black, bold and bountiful". Thehindubusinessline.in. 13 August 2010. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
- There is no entity named Swiss Banking Association; there is, however, one named Swiss Bankers Association. For verifiability, this WorldHeritage article uses the misnomer interchangeably, since it was widely mentioned by Indian media.
- "Govt to reveal stand on black money on 25 Jan – India News – IBNLive". Ibnlive.in.com. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
- "Govt To Reveal Stand on Black Money on 25 Jan | India news, Latest news India, Breaking news India, Current headlines India, News from India on Business, Sports, Politics, Bollywood and World News online". Currentnewsindia.com. 25 January 2011. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
- "No 'black money' statistics exist: Swiss banks". The Times of India. 13 September 2009. Retrieved 13 November 2011.
- "No 'black money' statistics exist: Swiss banks". The Times of India. 13 September 2009.
- India Country Profile from Business Anti-Corruption Portal, accessed at 16 August 2013.
- Kaur, Ravinder (2012) 'India Inc. and its Moral Discontents', Economic and Political Weekly http://www.academia.edu/3347336/India_Inc._and_its_moral_discontents
- Praful Bidwai. "INDIA: Legal System in the Dock".
- "Judiciary stares at morality crisis". India Today. January 12, 2014. Retrieved 2014-04-17.
- Chakravarty, Pratap (23 January 2010). "Indian land scandal spotlights military corruption". Taiwan News. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
- Example links to Indian government's implementation of the Right to Information Act. (Click the RTI Links column)
- "Punjab clears Right to Services Act". 8 June 2011 (Chennai, India: The Hindu). 8 June 2011. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
- "Corruption watchdog hails Bihar, MP govts as best service-providers". Times of India. 21 April 2011. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
- Issue Brief: PRS Note of Corruption Laws in India
- "Lokpal Bill gets President's nod - The Times of India". The Times Of India.
- "Notification". Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
- "Indian Parliament passes Whistleblowers Protection Bill 2011". IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
- "Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011". Gazette of India. Retrieved 13 May 2014.
- 2013 EY Study on Bribery and Corruption
- "Companies Act 2013 What will be its impact on fraud in India?". EY. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
- Jen Swanson (15 August 2013). "India Seeks to Overhaul a Corporate World Rife With Fraud" ("Dealbook" blog). The New York Times. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
- "Parliament passes Companies Bill 2012(Update)". Yahoo! News India. ANI. 8 August 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
- "A.P. Departments Anti-Corruption Bureau". A.P. Government. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
- "Karnataka Lokayukta".
- PTI (19 June 2012). "Andhra cash-for-bail scam: Suspended judge questioned". The Times of India.
- Tariq Engineer (19 June 2012). "Srinivasan questioned in politician's corruption case". ESPN CricInfo.
- G Babu Jayakumar (10 April 2011). "Wasn’t easy for Anna's ‘thambis’". The New Indian Express (in Indian English) (India). Retrieved 12 May 2011.
- "Tata Tea and NGO launch programme on right to vote for youth". The Hindu. 16 September 2008. Retrieved 30 May 2011.
- "Articles". Tata Tea. Retrieved 30 May 2011.
- "Corruption in India – A rotten state". The Economist. 10 March 2011.
- U Myint (December 2000). "CORRUPTION: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES AND CURES". Asia-Pacific Development Journal 7 (2).
- Vito Tanzi (December 1998). Corruption Around the World – Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures 45 (4). IMF Staff Papers.
- Anant and Mitra (November 1998). "The Role of Law and Legal Institutions in Asian Economic Development: The Case of India". Harvard University.
- Colvin, Geoff (20 April 2011). "Corruption: The biggest threat to developing economies". CNNMoney. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- Myrdal, Gunnar. Asian Drama: An Enquiry in the Poverty of Nations, The Australian Quarterly (Dec 1968, Vol. 40, 4)
- Mauro, Paolo. Corruption and Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics (Aug 1995, Vol. 110, 3)
- Levine, Ross. Renalt, David. A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions, The American Economic Review (Sep 1992, Vol. 8, 4)
- Mankiw, N. Geogory et al. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (May 1992, Vol. 107, 2)
- "How Much do Distortions Affect Growth".
- 2012 Indian anti-corruption movement
- 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement
- Jan Lokpal Bill
- Right to Public Services legislation
- Lok Ayukta
If corruption levels in India were reduced to levels in developed economies such as Singapore or the United Kingdom, India's GDP growth rate could increase at a higher rate annually. C. K. Prahalad estimates the lost opportunity caused by corruption, in terms of investment, growth and jobs for India is over US$50 billion a year.
Lower corruption, higher growth rates
Bureaucratic inefficiency also affects growth directly, such as through misallocation of investments in the economy. Additionally, corruption results in lower economic growth for a given level of income.
Corruption may lead to further bureaucratic delay and inefficiency as corrupted bureaucrats may introduce red tape in order to extort more bribes. Such inadequacies in institutional efficiency could affect growth indirectly by lowering the private marginal product of capital and investment rate. Levine and Renelt showed that investment rate is a robust determinant of economic growth. According to the neoclassical growth model, institutional variables contribute to determining steady-state per capita income levels and speed of convergence to its steady state, hence affecting its growth rate.
According to a report by KPMG, "high-level corruption and scams are now threatening to derail the country's it is credibility and [its] economic boom".
A study on Bribery and Corruption in India conducted in 2013 by one of the largest global professional services firms Ernst & Young (EY), a majority of the survey respondents from PE firms said that a company operating in a sector which is perceived as highly corrupt, may lose ground when it comes to fair valuation of its business, as investors bargain hard and factor in the cost of corruption at the time of transaction.
Loss of credibility
Impact of corruption
Vito Tanzi in an International Monetary Fund study suggests that in India, like other countries in the world, corruption is caused by excessive regulations and authorisation requirements, complicated taxes and licensing systems, mandated spending programmes, lack of competitive free markets, monopoly of certain goods and service providers by government controlled institutions, bureaucracy, lack of penalties for corruption of public officials, and lack of transparent laws and processes. A Harvard University study finds these to be some of the causes of corruption and underground economy in India.
In addition to tax rates and regulatory burden, the KPMG report claims corruption results from opaque process and paperwork on the part of the government. Lack of transparency allows room for maneuver for both the demanders and suppliers of corruption. Whenever objective standards and transparent processes are missing, and subjective opinion driven regulators and opaque/hidden processes are present, the conditions encourage corruption.
The desire to pay lower taxes than those demanded by the state explains the demand side of corruption. The net result is that the corrupt officials collect bribes, the government fails to collect taxes for its own budget, and corruption grows. The report suggests regulatory reforms, process simplification and lower taxes as means to increase tax receipts and reduce causes of corruption.
This power of Indian authorities to search and question individuals creates opportunities for corrupt public officials to extract bribes - each individual or business decides if the effort required in due process and the cost of delay is worth not paying the bribe demanded. In cases of high taxes, paying off the corrupt official is cheaper than the tax. This, claims the report, is one major cause of corruption in India and 150 other countries across the world. In real estate industry, the high capital gains tax in India encourages large-scale corruption. The correlation between high real estate taxes and corruption, claims the KPMG report, is high in India as well as other countries including the developed economies; this correlation has been true in modern times as well as for centuries of human history in numerous cultures.
In a 2011 report on Corruption in India, one of the world's largest audit and compliance firms KPMG notes several causes that encourage corruption in India. The report suggests high taxes and excessive regulation bureaucracy as a major cause. India has high marginal tax rates and numerous regulatory bodies with the power to stop any citizen or business from going about their daily affairs.
Factors contributing to corruption in India
One organisation, the Lok Satta Party. The party has fielded candidates in Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Bangalore. In 2009, it obtained its first elected post, when Jayaprakash Narayan won the election for the Kukatpally Assembly Constituency in Andhra Pradesh.
- Bharat Swabhiman Trust established by well-known Yog Guru Swami Ramdev running a large campaign against black money and corruption since last 10 years.
- 5th Pillar is most known for the creation of the zero rupee note, a valueless note designed to be given to corrupt officials when they request bribes.
- India Against Corruption is a movement created by citizens from a variety of profession and status to work against corruption in India. The movement gathered tremendous media attention and came to the forefront in 2012. Prominent people associated with the movement were Arvind Kejriwal, Kiran Bedi & Anna Hazare. In late 2012, Arvind Kejriwal took the route to form a political party to fight corruption while Anna Hazare & Kiran Bedi remain apolitical. The apolitical movement is currently headed by Anna Hazare while the political party formed by Arvind Kejriwal & his followers is called Aam Aadmi Party .
- Tata Tea and Janaagraha to increase youth voter registration. They have since expanded their work to include other social issues, including corruption.
- Association for Social Transparency, Rights and Action (ASTRA) is an NGO focused on grass-roots work to fight corruption in Karnataka.
A variety of organisations have been created in India to actively fight against corrupt government and business practices. Notable organisations include:
Civic anti-corruption organisations
Andhra Pradesh's Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) has launched a large scale investigation in the "cash-for-bail" scam. CBI court judge Talluri Pattabhirama Rao was arrested on 19 June 2012 for taking a bribe to grant bail to former Karnataka Minister Gali Janardhan Reddy, who was allegedly amassing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. Investigation revealed that India Cements – one of India's largest cement – had been investing in Reddy's businesses in return for government contracts. A case has also been opened against seven other individuals under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation, Central Vigilance Commission and Central Bureau of Investigation all deal with anti-corruption initiatives. Certain states such as Andhra Pradesh (Anti-Corruption Bureau, Andhra Pradesh) and Karnataka (Lokayukta) also have their own anti-corruption agencies and courts.
Anti-corruption police and courts
The Companies Act, 2013, contains certain provisions to regulate frauds by corporations, including, increased penalties for frauds, giving more powers to Serious Fraud Investigation Office, mandatory responsibility of auditors to reveal frauds, and increased responsibilities of independent directors. The Companies Act, 2013 also provides for mandatory vigil mechanism which allows directors and employees to report concerns and whistleblower protection mechanism for every listed company and any other companies which accepts deposits from public or has taken loans more than 50 crore rupees from banks and financial institutions. This intended to avoid accounting scandals such as the Satyam scandal which have plagued India. It replaces The Companies Act, 1956 which was proven outmoded in terms of handling 21st century problems.
A committee headed by the Chairman of Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), has been constituted to examine ways to strengthen laws to curb generation of black money in India, its illegal transfer abroad and its recovery. The Committee shall examine the existing legal and administrative framework to deal with the menace of generation of black money through illegal means including inter-alia the following: 1. Declaring wealth generated illegally as national asset; 2. Enacting/amending laws to confiscate and recover such assets; and 3. Providing for exemplary punishment against its perpetrators. (Source: 2013 EY report on Bribery & Corruption)
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 provides that the properties of corrupt public servants shall be confiscated. However, the Government is considering incorporating provisions for confiscation or forfeiture of the property of corrupt public servant in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to make it more self-contained and comprehensive.
At present there are no legal provisions to check graft in the private sector in India. Government has proposed amendments in existing acts and certain new bills for checking corruption in private sector. Big-ticket corruption is mainly witnessed in the operations of large commercial or corporate entities. In order to prevent bribery on supply side, it is proposed that key managerial personnel of companies' and also the company shall be held liable for offering bribes to gain undue benefits.
Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011, which provides a mechanism to investigate alleged corruption and misuse of power by public servants and also protect anyone who exposes alleged wrongdoing in government bodies, projects and offices, has received the assent of the President of India on 9 May 2014, and (as of 02 August) is pending for notification by the Central Government.
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 which came into force from 16 January 2014, seeks to provide for the establishment of the institution of Lokpal to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain public functionaries in India.
India is also a signatory to the United Nations Convention against Corruption since 2005 (ratified 2011). The Convention covers a wide range of acts of corruption and also proposes certain preventive policies.
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Prosecution section of Income Tax Act, 1961
- The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 to prohibit benami transactions.
- Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
Public servants in India can be penalised for corruption under the
Anti-corruption laws in India
Right to Public Services legislation, which has been enacted in 19 states of India, guarantee time bound delivery of services for various public services rendered by the Government to citizen and provides mechanism for punishing the errant public servant who is deficient in providing the service stipulated under the statute. Right to Service legislation are meant to reduce corruption among the government officials and to increase transparency and public accountability.
Right to public services legislation
According to a study published by the Government of India's RTI site, the Right to Information Act (2005) and equivalent acts in the states, that require government officials to provide information requested by citizens or face punitive action, computerisation of services and various central and state government acts that established vigilance commissions have considerably reduced corruption or at least have opened up avenues to redress grievances. However, people seeking information under RTI have been identified and harassed, attacked or killed.
Right to Information Act
The Indian Armed Forces have witnessed corruption involving senior armed forces officers from the Indian Army, Indian Navy and Indian Air Force. A number of scandals in the 2000–2010 period damaged the military's reputation; such scandals included skimming of armed forces money, re-selling of government property, and faking combat missions.
According to Transparency International, judicial corruption in India is attributable to factors such as "delays in the disposal of cases, shortage of judges and complex procedures, all of which are exacerbated by a preponderance of new laws". Over the year there have been numerous judges who have faced allegations of corruption, however in 2011, Soumitra Sen, a former judge at the Kolkata High Court became the first judge in the India to be impeached by the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of the Indian Parliament for misappropriation of funds.
Public servants have very wide discretionary powers offering the opportunity to extort undue payments from companies and ordinary citizens. The awarding of public contracts is notoriously corrupt, especially at the state level. Scandals involving high-level politicians have highlighted the payment of kickbacks in the healthcare, IT and military sectors. The deterioration of the overall efficiency of the government, protection of property rights, ethics and corruption as well as undue influence on government and judicial decisions has resulted in a more difficult business environment. Corruption has become a particularly significant issue for India Inc. - the corporate sector in India - which fears that India's business worthiness is eroded because of endemic corruption.
Business and Corruption
According to a third report, published in May 2012, Swiss National Bank estimates that the total amount of deposits in all Swiss banks, at the end of 2010, by citizens of India were CHF 1.95 billion ( 92.95 billion, US$2.1 billion). The Swiss Ministry of External Affairs has confirmed these figures upon request for information by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs. This amount is about 700 fold less than the alleged $1.4 trillion in some media reports. The report also provided a comparison of the deposits held by Indians and by citizens of other nations in Swiss banks. Total deposits held by citizens of India constitute only 0.13 per cent of the total bank deposits of citizens of all countries. Further, the share of Indians in the total bank deposits of citizens of all countries in Swiss banks has reduced from 0.29 per cent in 2006 to 0.13 per cent in 2010.
In a separate study, Dev Kar of Global Financial Integrity concludes, "media reports circulating in India that Indian nationals held around US$1.4 trillion in illicit external assets are widely off the mark compared to the estimates found by his study." Kar claims the amounts are significantly smaller, only about 1.5% of India's GDP on average per annum basis, between 1948 and 2008. This includes corruption, bribery and kickbacks, criminal activities, trade mispricing and efforts to shelter wealth by Indians from India's tax authorities.
Another report said that Indian-owned Swiss bank account assets are worth 13 times the country's national debt. These allegations have been denied by Swiss Bankers Association. James Nason of Swiss Bankers Association in an interview about alleged black money from India, holds that "The (black money) figures were rapidly picked up in the Indian media and in Indian opposition circles, and circulated as gospel truth. However, this story was a complete fabrication. The Swiss Bankers Association never published such a report. Anyone claiming to have such figures (for India) should be forced to identify their source and explain the methodology used to produce them."
According to a 2010 The Hindu article, unofficial estimates indicate that Indians had over US$1456 billion in black money stored in Swiss banks (approximately US$1.4 trillion). While some news reports claimed that data provided by the Swiss Banking Association Report (2006) showed India has more black money than the rest of the world combined, a more recent report quoted the SBA's Head of International Communications as saying that no such official Swiss Banking Association statistics exist.
Black Money in Switzerland
A November 2010 report from the Washington-based Global Financial Integrity estimates that over a 60-year period, India lost US$213 billion in illicit financial flows beginning in 1948; adjusted for inflation, this is estimated to be 462 billion in 2010 dollars, or about $8 billion per year ($7 per capita per year). The report also estimated the size of India's underground economy at approximately US$640 billion at the end of 2008 or roughly 50% of the nation's GDP.
Black money refers to money that is not fully or legitimately the property of the 'owner'. A white paper on black money in India by the Government of India suggests two possible sources of black money in India. The first includes activities not permitted by the law, such as crime, drug trade, terrorism, and corruption, all of which are illegal in India. The second, more likely source is that the wealth may have been generated through a lawful activity but accumulated by failing to declare income and pay taxes. Some of this black money ends up in illicit financial flows across international borders, such as deposits in tax haven countries.
|Jammu & Kashmir||0.13||0.32||0.17||0.40|
The table below compares the perceived anti-corruption effort across some of the major states in India. A rising index implies higher anti-corruption effort and falling corruption. According to this table, the states of Bihar and Gujarat have experienced significant improvements in their anti-corruption efforts, while the conditions have worsened in the state of Assam and West Bengal. Consistent with the results in this table, in 2012, a BBC News report claimed the state of Bihar has transformed in recent years to become the least corrupt state in India.
CMS India claims in its 2010 India Corruption Study report that socio-economically weaker section of the Indian society is most adversely affected by government corruption – these include the rural and urban poor. The study additionally claims that corruption perception nationwide has decreased between 2005 to 2010. Over the 5-year period, significantly more number of people from the middle class as well as the poorest segments of Indian society surveyed, in all parts of the India, claimed government corruption had dropped over time, and they had lesser direct experiences with demands for bribes.
A 2011 KPMG study reports India's real estate, telecommunications and government-run social development projects as the three top most corruption plagued sectors. The study found India's defence, information technology industry and energy sectors are the most competitive and least corruption prone sectors.
Bribery and corruption are pervasive, but some sectors tend to witness a relatively higher degree of such instances. A 2013 EY(Ernst & Young) Study reports following sectors, perceived as the most vulnerable to corruption: Infrastructure & Real Estate, Metals & Mining, Aerospace & Defense, Power & Utilities. There are a range of specific factors that make a sector more susceptible to bribery and corruption risks than others. Factors like high use of middlemen, large value contracts, liasioning activities etc. drive the depth, volume and frequency of corrupt practices in vulnerable sectors.
Professor Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari claim in their book Corruption in India: The DNA and RNA that the public officials in India may be cornering as much as 921 billion ($18.42 billion), or 1.26 per cent of the GDP, through corruption. The book claims most bribery is in the transport industry, real estate and government delivered services.
Agents are the channels of corruption in this bureaucratic driver licensing system, facilitating access to licenses among those who are unqualified to drive. Some of the failures of this licensing system are caused by corrupt bureaucrats who collaborate with agents by creating additional barriers within the system against those who did not hire agents.
The average licensee paid Rs 1080, approximately 2.5 times the official fee of Rs 450, in order to obtain a license. On average, those who hired agents had a lower driving ability, with agents helping unqualified drivers obtain licenses and bypass the legally required driving examination. Among the surveyed individuals, approximately 60% of the license holders did not take the licensing exam and 54% of those license holders failed an independent driving test.
A study conducted between 2004 and 2005 found that India's driver licensing procedure was a hugely distorted bureaucratic process and allows drivers to be licensed despite their low driving ability through promoting the usage of agents. Individuals with high willingness to pay make a significant payment above the official fee and most of these extra payments are made to agents, who act as an intermediary between bureaucrats and applicants.
IAS officers who have worked on to put up a stronghold against the illegal mining mafia have faced severe backlashes from the government in direct and indirect ways in the past. Recent and glaring example of this is the suspension of the IAS officer Durga Shakti Nagpal in UP after her strong response to illegal sand mining mafia in the corruption riddled state.
It was also alleged that corrupt government officials cooperated with Reddy, starting from government officials in charge of regulating mining to government officials in charge of regulating port facilities and shipping. These officials received monthly bribes in exchange for enabling the illegal export of illegally mined iron ore to China. Such scandals have led to a demand in India for consensually driven action plan to eradicate the piracy of India's mineral resources by an illegal-political-corrupt government officials-business nexus, removal of incentives for illegal mining, creation of incentives for legal mining and domestic use of iron ore and steel manufacturing.°
In August 2011, an iron ore mining scandal became a media focus in India. In September 2011, Janardhana Reddy – an elected member of Karnataka's legislative assembly – was arrested on charges of corruption and illegal mining of iron ore in his home state of Karnataka. It was alleged that his company received preferential allotment of resources, organised and exported billions of dollars worth of iron ore to China in recent years, without paying any royalty to the state government exchequer of Karnataka or the central government of India, and these Chinese companies made payment to shell companies controlled by Reddy and registered in Caribbean and north Atlantic tax havens.
Preferential award of mineral resources
There have been several cases of collusion of officials of the income tax department of India for preferential tax treatment and relaxed prosecutions in exchange for bribes.
Income tax department
There are many issues facing Indian scientists, with some - such as MIT systems scientist VA Shiva Ayyadurai - calling for transparency, a meritocratic system, and an overhaul of the bureaucratic agencies that oversee science and technology. Sumit Bhaduri stated, "The challenges of turning Indian science into part of an innovation process are many. Many competent Indian scientists aspire to be ineffectual administrators [due to administrative power and political patronage], rather than do the kind of science that makes a difference". Prime minister Manmohan Singh spoke at the 99th Indian Science Congress and commented on the state of the sciences in India, after an advisory council informed him there were problems with "the overall environment for innovation and creative work" and a 'warlike' approach was needed.