Tax reform

Tax reform

Tax reform is the process of changing the way taxes are collected or managed by the government. Tax reformers have different goals. Some seek to reduce the level of taxation of all people by the government. Some seek to make the tax system more progressive or less progressive. Others seek to simplify the tax system and make the system more understandable or more accountable.

Numerous organizations have been set up to reform tax systems worldwide, often with the intent to reform land tax can both deal with externalities and improve productivity.


Tax reform is an increasingly significant issue on the Australian political agenda.[1][2] Combined annual deficits of the Commonwealth and State and territory governments will rise from 1.9% of gross domestic product in 2011–12 to 5.9% of GDP by 2049–50.[3] Widespread, wholesale tax reform in Australia has not occurred since the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax in 2000. The Henry Tax Review identified 138 areas for significant reform to Australia's tax system over the next 10 to 20 years.

In July 2013, PricewaterhouseCoopers proposed significant tax reform in the context of an ageing population and slowing of the Australian mining boom.[4] PricewaterhouseCoopers proposed improving the efficiency of the Australian tax system through analysing the competitiveness of the levels of taxation, its effect on production and the importance of broad-based taxes to reduce economic distortion.[5] For example, over 115 other taxes raise less revenue than one tax: the Goods and Services Tax.[6] This Report received widespread coverage in the Australian press.[7][8][9][10]

United States

"'Revenue Reform' Train Stopped by 'Vested Interests,' 'Local Issues,' 'Trusts,' and other poles" — Political cartoon from 1880–1900 commenting on tax reform.

There have been many movements in the United States to reform the collection and management of taxes.

During the late 19th century American economist, Single Tax on land value. The effects of the movement on taxation policy, although diminished can still be seen in many parts of the world including Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. Efforts to promote this form of tax reform in the United States continue under the aegis of organizations such as The Henry George Foundation of America.

In 1986, landmark tax reform was passed in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. In the 1990s, reform proposals arose over the double-taxation of corporate income, with a large report in 1992 by the IRS.[11]

During the United States including Americans for Tax Reform, Americans For Fair Taxation and Americans Standing for the Simplification of the Estate Tax (ASSET). Various proposals have been put forth for tax simplification in the United States, including the FairTax and various flat tax plans and bipartisan tax reform proposals.[12]

In 2010, Fareed Zakaria proposed what he described as a "grand bargain" with tax reform for economic adversaries Paul Krugman and Niall Ferguson; an attempt to bridge their political divide with the creation of a simple and indirect Federal Sales Tax.[13] Representative Chaka Fattah of Pennsylvania introduced a bill, H.R. 4646,[14] called the Debt Free America Act that would introduce a 1% financial transaction tax and eliminate federal income tax. He has introduced bills calling for similar tax reform since 2004, but the bills have never made it out of committee.[15]

President Obama’s tax reform proposals are highlighted in his administration’s fiscal year 2013 federal budget proposal and in a framework for corporate and international tax reform presented by the administration.[16] While some of these proposals have become irrelevant due to “The Fiscal Cliff” agreement at the end of calendar year 2012, these policies are important to highlight as they present a center-left approach to tax reform. In general, the proposals involve some marginal tax rate increases, some marginal tax rate decreases, and base broadening by closing, canceling, or limiting loopholes, deductions, credits, or other tax expenditures for top income earners and corporations. Reforming the tax code is reportedly a priority for the 113th Congress.

Tax choice

Tax choice is the theory that taxpayers should have more control with how their individual taxes are allocated. If taxpayers could choose which government organizations received their taxes, opportunity cost decisions would integrate their partial knowledge.[17] For example, a taxpayer who allocated more of his taxes on public education would have less to allocate on public healthcare. Supporters argue that allowing taxpayers to demonstrate their preferences would help ensure that the government succeeds at efficiently producing the public goods that taxpayers truly value.[18]

See also


  1. ^ Uren, Dan (26 September 2013). "In a smaller world, tax reform is overdue".  
  2. ^ Glenday, James (16 August 2013). "Is it time to reform our 'struggling' tax system?".  
  3. ^ "Protecting Prosperity: Why we need to talk about tax".  
  4. ^ Tax Reform: Why you should care ( 
  5. ^ "Protecting prosperity: Why we need to talk about tax" ( 
  6. ^ "Protecting prosperity: Why we need to talk about tax" ( 
  7. ^ McMahon, Stephen (23 July 2013). "Report calls on 'fundamental' tax reform to avoid ongoing budget deficits".  
  8. ^ Burnham, Steve (13 November 2013). "Tax reform is essential to protect Australia’s future, says PwC". Taxpayers Australia. Retrieved 13 January 2013. 
  9. ^ O'Dwyer, Kelly (13 November 2012). "Australia needs to get serious about tax reform".  
  10. ^ White, Andrew (23 July 2013). "Government debt to balloon without tax reform, warns PwC".  
  11. ^ Fleenor P, Williams J. (2006). Options for Reforming the U.S. Corporate Income Tax. Tax Foundation.
  12. ^ Salvaging a Domestic Agenda: Toward Bipartisan Tax Reform, Washington Monthly
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^ Bickley, James. "Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress." Congressional Research Service. 26 Oct. 2012.[1]
  17. ^ "Tax morale and conditional cooperation". Retrieved 3 January 2013. 
  18. ^ "Do Earmarks Increase Giving to Government?". Retrieved 3 January 2013. 

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; GNU Free Documentation License; additional terms may apply; additional licensing terms may not be displayed on the current page, please review the citiational source for the most up to date information. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.

Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.