Zuo zhuan title page, Ming dynasty print (16th century)
|Author||(trad.) Zuo Qiuming|
|Country||Zhou dynasty (China)|
|Subject||History of the Spring and Autumn period|
|Published||late 4th century BC|
|Literal meaning||"Zuo Tradition"|
|Literal meaning||"Mr. Zuo's Tradition of the Chunqiu [Spring and Autumn Annals]"|
The Zuo zhuan (pronounced ; Chinese: 左傳), generally translated as Zuo Tradition or Commentary of Zuo, is an ancient Chinese narrative history that is traditionally regarded as a commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu 春秋). It comprises 30 densely written chapters covering a period from 722 to 468 BC, and focuses mainly on political, diplomatic, and military affairs from that era.
Unlike the other two surviving Annals commentaries—the Gongyang and Guliang commentaries—the Zuo zhuan does not simply explain the wording of the Annals, but greatly expounds upon its historical background, and contains a large number of rich and lively accounts of Spring and Autumn period history and culture. The Zuo zhuan is the source of more Chinese sayings and idioms than any other classical work, and its concise, flowing style came to be held as a paragon of elegant Classical Chinese. Its tendency toward third-person narration and portraying characters through direct speech and action became hallmarks of Chinese narrative in general, and its style was imitated by historians, storytellers, and ancient style prose masters for over 2000 years of subsequent Chinese history.
Although the Zuo zhuan has long been regarded as "a masterpiece of grand historical narrative", its early textual history is largely unknown, and the nature of its original composition and authorship have been widely debated. The "Zuo" of the Zuo zhuan's title was traditionally believed to refer to one "Zuo Qiuming"—an obscure figure of the 5th century BC described as a blind disciple of Confucius—but there is little actual evidence to support this. Modern scholars now generally believe that the Zuo zhuan was originally an independent work composed during the latter half of the 4th century BC that was later rearranged as a commentary to the Annals.
- Authorship 1.1
- Commentary status 1.2
- Manuscripts 1.3
- Battles 2.1
- Moral verdicts 2.2
Tracing the early history of the Zuo zhuan is complicated by the fact that there were originally two versions of it: one, known as the "modern script" (jinwen 今文) version, which circulated during the early Han dynasty; and another, known as the "ancient script" (guwen 古文) version, which was discovered in the Han imperial archives by scholar Liu Xin during the reign of Emperor Ai of Han (r. 7–1 BC). Like the other two surviving commentaries on the Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu 春秋)—the Gongyang and Guliang traditions—the Zuo zhuan originally existed in an independent format, with no direct references to the Annals. In the 3rd century AD, scholar Du Yu intercalated it with the Annals so that each Annals entry was followed by the corresponding narrative from the Zuo zhuan, which became the received format of the Zuo zhuan that exists today.
The earliest known mention of the Zuo zhuan appears in Sima Qian's Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji 史記), China's first dynastic history, which was completed about 104 BC. The Records refers to the Zuo zhuan as "Master Zuo's Spring and Autumn Annals" (Zuoshi Chunqiu 左氏春秋) and attributes it to a man named "Zuo Qiuming" (or possibly "Zuoqiu Ming"), traditionally assumed to be the Zuo Qiuming who briefly appears in the Analects of Confucius (Lunyu 論語) when Confucius praises him for his moral judgment. Other than his brief mention in the Analects, nothing is concretely known of Zuo Qiuming's life or identity, nor of what connection he might have with the Zuo zhuan. This traditional assumption that the title's "Master Zuo" refers to the Zuo Qiuming of the Analects is not based on any specific evidence, and was challenged by scholars as early as the 8th century during the Tang dynasty. Even if the Zuo Qiuming of the Analects is the "Zuo" referenced in the Zuo zhuan's title, this attribution is questionable because the Zuo zhuan describes events from the late Spring and Autumn period that he would not have known. Alternatively, some scholars have suggested that the Zuo zhuan was actually the product of one Wu Qi (吳起; d. 381 or 378 BC), a military leader who served in the State of Wei and who, according to the Han Feizi, was from a place called "Zuoshi".
In the early 19th century, the Chinese scholar Liu Fenglu (1776–1829) initiated a long, drawn-out controversy when he proposed, by emphasizing certain discrepancies between it and the Annals, that the Zuo zhuan was not originally a commentary on the Annals. Liu's theory was taken much further by the noted scholar and reformer Wang Mang.
Kang's theory was supported by several subsequent Chinese scholars in the late 19th century, but was contradicted by a large number of 20th-century studies that examined it from many different perspectives. In the early 1930s, French sinologist
A number of Zuo zhuan anecdotes end with brief moral comments or verdicts that are attributed to either Confucius or an unnamed junzi (君子; "gentleman", "lordling", or "superior man"). These "moral of the story" postfaces, which were
The narrative of the Battle of Chengpu is typical of Zuo zhuan battle narratives in that the description of the battle itself is relatively brief, most of the narrative being focused on battle preparations, omens and prognostications regarding its outcome, the division of the spoils, and the shifts and defections of the various allied states involved in the conflict. This "official [and] restrained" style, which became typical of Chinese historical writing, is largely due to the ancient Chinese belief that ritual propriety and strategic preparation were more important than individual valor or bravery in determining the outcome of battles.
The Battle of Chengpu, the first of the Zuo zhuan's great battles, took place in 632 BC at Chengpu (modern Juancheng County, Shandong Province) in the State of Wey. On one side were the troops of the powerful State of Chu, from what was then far southern China, led by the Chu prime minister Cheng Dechen. They were opposed by the armies of the State of Jin, led by Chong'er, Duke of Jin, one of the most prominent and well known figures in the Zuo zhuan. Chu suffered a disastrous defeat in the battle itself, and it resulted in Chong'er being named Hegemon (ba 霸) of the various states.
|Text (Chinese)||Ruler of the State of Lu||
|Period of Coverage|
|隱公||Duke Yin of Lu (魯隱公)||11||722 – 712 BC|
|桓公||Duke Huan of Lu (魯桓公)||18||711 – 694 BC|
|莊公||Duke Zhuang of Lu (魯莊公)||32||693 – 662 BC|
|閔公||Duke Min of Lu (魯閔公)||2||661 – 660 BC|
|僖公||Duke Xi of Lu (魯僖公)||33||659 – 627 BC|
|文公||Duke Wen of Lu (魯文公)||18||626 – 609 BC|
|宣公||Duke Xuan of Lu (魯宣公)||18||608 – 591 BC|
|成公||Duke Cheng of Lu (魯成公)||18||590 – 573 BC|
|襄公||Duke Xiang of Lu (魯襄公)||31||572 – 542 BC|
|昭公||Duke Zhao of Lu (魯昭公)||32||541 – 510 BC|
|定公||Duke Ding of Lu (魯定公)||15||509 – 495 BC|
|哀公||Duke Ai of Lu (魯哀公)||27||494 – 468 BC|
The Zuo zhuan recounts the major political, military, and social events of the Spring and Autumn period, and is famous "for its dramatic power and realistic details". Speeches feature prominently in nearly all Zuo zhuan stories. Like most ancient Chinese history, the narratives of the Zuo zhuan are highly didactic in nature, and are presented in such a way that they teach and illustrate moral principles.
The oldest surviving Zuo zhuan manuscripts are six fragments that were discovered among the Dunhuang manuscripts in the early 20th century by the French sinologist Paul Pelliot and are now held at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France. Four of the fragments date to the Six Dynasties period (3rd to 6th centuries), while the other two date to the early Tang dynasty (7th century). The oldest known complete Zuo zhuan manuscript is the "ancient manuscript scroll" preserved at the Kanazawa Bunko Museum in Yokohama, Japan.
.Annals—composed during the latter half of the 4th century BC that was later rearranged as a commentary to the State of Qi was originally an independent work—possibly a history of the Zuo zhuan and modern scholars now generally believe that the